Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the fictional early papacy became real
Beggars All Martin Luther's Mariology ^ | June 7,2010 | John Bugay

Posted on 02/14/2015 1:16:14 PM PST by RnMomof7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 521-528 next last
To: goodwithagun

Tomorrow is a new day. Take advantage of that.


161 posted on 02/14/2015 6:36:44 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

You’re presenting a false dichotomy and demanding an answer that makes as much sense as “Can God make a rock so big He can’t move it?”. The Church is not wrong, God is not wrong. The answer is longer than yes or no because the question is faulty.

I’m not going to take you seriously because you persist in calling the Bride of Christ a cult in a disparaging manner.

Nevertheless, no one shall enter Heaven except those saved by the Blood of Christ. Nobody else would even want to anyhow.


162 posted on 02/14/2015 6:38:24 PM PST by Legatus (Either way, we're screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

Back at you.


163 posted on 02/14/2015 6:40:32 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun; Col Freeper; CynicalBear
As I posted, you’re free to create your own site at your own expense. Purposefully dividing this community is not the intent of the site.

The creators of FR provided the Religion Forum with intention, as part of their commitment to our Constitutional freedoms, and it has been within the scope of their design that we should be able to freely discuss our religious differences, providing we maintain a certain level of civility.  It's in keeping with us being a free republic.  These differences we have are real, and we will have to deal with them until the return of Christ.  Far better we have a place like this we can come to and exchange strongly worded opinions, than fight a religious war in some Middle Eastern desert, the end point of which is the suppression of this very kind of speech.  If the darkness of an Islamic caliphate ever fell over this country, we would be one of the first sites shut down, and every one here who participated here in proclaiming Jesus as the only salvation provided by God would become hunted men and women.  It is not an impossible outcome.  Until that day arrives, we should exercise our freedom to proclaim the Gospel, according to the best light God gives us (hint: Scripture), with a strong and unrelenting voice.  As difficult as they seem to be for some here, we may not always have the pleasure of these good days, or of each other's good company.  A good thing often isn't missed until it's gone.

Peace,

SR
164 posted on 02/14/2015 6:41:21 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

So inferring isn’t our strong suit here: My original post wayyyyyy up thread was to show that Islamists are silencing us all over the globe while keyboard warriors blame Catholics for this and Protestants for that. Pray for our world, it’s on fire.


165 posted on 02/14/2015 6:46:20 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

I think it’s worth pointing out that the muslims would just as happily torch a Catholic as a Protestant and consider their god well served.


166 posted on 02/14/2015 6:46:44 PM PST by Legatus (Either way, we're screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Well, that little dig deserves the response of pointing out the pedophile priests that the Catholic church has mishandled for decades at the very least.

We all agree that humans are sinful and all of us fall to temptation so I will repeat:

If you would like to go over a list of sinful human beings, I can do the same with Protestant Preachers who founded their own churches and couldn't keep their pants zipped, but that's not necessary.

167 posted on 02/14/2015 6:48:26 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Legatus; HossB86
The Church is not wrong, God is not wrong.

Which church" The Roman one or the EO one who holds to different doctrines and considers the themselves the OTC and the Roman rite off the rails.

They disagree in the following areas.

How can they both be true?

These differences are so important that there has been no reconciliation in nearly a thousand years after the split. The Eastern Orthodox differ with Roman Catholicism on these issues:

The Holy Spirit (the filioque)

In EO - The third person of the Trinity, proceeding from the Father alone as in the original Nicene Creed. The Father sends the Spirit at the intercession of the Son. The Son is therefore an agent only in the procession of the Spirit.

In RC - 'When the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, He is not separated from the Father, He is not separated from the Son'.

Mary - Assumption and Immaculate conception of

EO - The Assumption is accepted and it is agreed that Mary experienced physical death, but the Immaculate conception is rejected. Orthodox belief is that the guilt of original sin is not transmitted from one generation to the next, thus obviating the need for Mary to be sinless.

RC - Both are dogmas of the church. The church has not as yet decided whether Mary actually experienced Physical death. The dogma of the Immaculate Conception states that Mary, was at conception 'preserved immaculate from all stain of original sin' and should not be confused with the virgin birth.

Pope - Authority of

EO - As the Bishop of Rome, he has a primacy of honour when Orthodox, not of jurisdiction. At present, his primacy is not effective as the papacy needs to be reformed in accordance with Orthodoxy. His authority is thus no greater or lesser than any of his fellow Bishops in the church.

RC - The Pope is the 'Vicar of Christ' i.e. the visible head of the church on earth and spiritual successor of St. Peter. He has supreme authority (including that over church councils) within Christendom (The Power of the keys).

Pope - Infallibility of

EO - Papal Infallibility is rejected. The Holy Spirit acts to guide the church into truth through (for example) ecumenical councils. This Orthodoxy recognises the first seven ecumenical councils (325-787) as being infallible.

RC - The Pope is infallible when, through the Holy Spirit, he defines a doctrine on faith and morals that is to be held by the whole church. This is a dogma and is therefore a required belief within Catholicism.

Purgatory

EO - An intermediate state between earth and heaven is recognised, but cleansing and purification occur in this life, not the next.

RC - A place of cleansing and preparation for heaven. Also a place where the punishment due to unremitted venial sins may be expiated.

I'd say these were the "biggies", but other differences also exist. These are explained

HERE

And this article is another comparison.

Comparison between Orthodoxy, Protestantism & Roman Catholicism:

http://christianityinview.com/comparison.html

168 posted on 02/14/2015 6:49:24 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
Which Jesus?

There is only one Jesus. I'm done here.

169 posted on 02/14/2015 6:50:20 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Legatus
You’re presenting a false dichotomy and demanding an answer that makes as much sense as “Can God make a rock so big He can’t move it?”. The Church is not wrong, God is not wrong. The answer is longer than yes or no because the question is faulty.

No, actually, a false dichotomy implies that there is some sort of rhetorical trick being used where there exists MORE than one answer. Here, there is one answer, and one answer only --

Either Christ, who from his own mouth said that no one comes to the Father except through himself -- meaning he is THE mediator between God and Man (and subsequently substantiated by Paul's inspired scripture in 1Tim2:5)

OR

Mary is the Mediatrix she is proclaimed to be by the Roman Catholic CULT in its Catechism listing 969.

Which is true? No false dichotomy here, but I do give you credit for trying to use a Straw-man argument. Talk about hypocrisy. Sheesh.

A) God
B) Roman Catholic Cult

We're waiting...

I’m not going to take you seriously because you persist in calling the Bride of Christ a cult in a disparaging manner.

I've never called the Bride of Christ anything disparaging; I along with all those called by God and saved through faith in Christ Jesus are the Bride of Christ.

The Roman Catholic Cult is exactly that...a cult.

Nevertheless, no one shall enter Heaven except those saved by the Blood of Christ. Nobody else would even want to anyhow.

Well now, we can agree on that -- it is the Blood of Christ that saves... not Baptismal Regeneration as taught by the Roman Catholic Cult... and not faith AND works... but Faith Alone. But I'm sure we'll differ on that.

Still... just for fun: A or B?

Hoss

170 posted on 02/14/2015 6:51:21 PM PST by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: metmom

And yet the Catholic here claim no split! That’s a split for sure!


171 posted on 02/14/2015 6:59:41 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Legatus; Springfield Reformer
I think it’s worth pointing out that the muslims would just as happily torch a Catholic as a Protestant and consider their god well served.

True -- but it is the Roman Catholic Cult's Catechism that teaches that Catholics and Mohammedans worship the same God:

"841 The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."

So, which "Creator" do Catholics and Mohammedans worship?

Hoss

172 posted on 02/14/2015 7:00:55 PM PST by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Before Christ ascended into heaven what did he do? What did he say?

Please read YOUR Bible.


173 posted on 02/14/2015 7:52:03 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

What do you think Catholics use? The Bible of course. And it states that Tradition is part of the our belief.

Read John and John’s letters — last chapters.


174 posted on 02/14/2015 7:54:14 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3257584/posts?page=174#174


175 posted on 02/14/2015 7:55:07 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: metmom

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3257584/posts?page=174#174


176 posted on 02/14/2015 7:56:24 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Now, don’t go trying to confuse things... Which is it?

You said Rome had Truth...not scripture. Now it’s both?

Let’s try this with you too:

Truth originates from:

A) God and His inerrant word
B) Rome’s “Traditions”
C) Both

Hoss


177 posted on 02/14/2015 8:04:52 PM PST by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: HossB86

You belive in Scripture, correct?

 

Then why don't you believe this?

 

John 21: (We'll be using the KJV today to keep things on even footing): "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen."

 

The Bible Itself declares that it doesn't contain everything.

 

John 20

30 Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book;

31 but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.


178 posted on 02/14/2015 8:17:31 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Leviticus 26 King James Version (KJV)

26 Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the Lord your God.


179 posted on 02/14/2015 8:18:36 PM PST by redleghunter (He expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning Himself. Lk24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Satan hates Scriptures.


180 posted on 02/14/2015 8:22:39 PM PST by redleghunter (He expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning Himself. Lk24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 521-528 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson