True in the sense that I'd already accepted "upon this rock" referring to Peter before I ever knew who those writers were.
But my point is that when several note that that interpretation today is accepted by a majority of Bible scholars, then at the least one should acknowledge that interpretation is a plausible one. Right?
Your acceptance was/is obviously NOT based on Scripture.
You must be one of those who are correctly catechized.
SAy no more; I hear you loud and clear!