Posted on 02/02/2015 3:08:42 PM PST by Morgana
That’s no decoder ring. That’s his seal of divine authority except when it’s not. If he uses the ring then he’s infallible and Christ on earth and when he doesn’t he’s just a bumbling idiot spouting off. I think that’s how that works. Not sure tho.
Did you even read what it says?
***of one substance with the Father as regards his Godhead, and AT THE SAME TIME of one substance with us as regards his manhood;***
***one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, WITHOUT DIVISION, WITHOUT SEPARATION***
***the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, NOT AS PARTED OR SEPARATED INTO TWO PERSONS, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God the Word,***
It clearly says that Christ’s two natures are one person and not two and they cannot be divided.
It also clearly says:
***Mary the Virgin, the God-bearer***
:)
I realize that you thought I meant that St. Paul taught the doctrine of the Trinity. What I was saying was that St. Paul indicates that in the early Church there were doctrines which were not written down and the Trinity was one of them.
Can God be divided? If not, who forsook who on the cross? And who did Jesus pray to?
Prove it.
No, God cannot be divided, so when Jesus was quoting Psalm 21:2 on the Cross I guess His human nature was talking to Himself.
I’m sorry, I don’t have time. I have to do laundry. And if I did have time, it would all be wasted on you because you are determined to argue. You have your mind made up, so even if I did “prove” it to you, you wouldn’t believe me. Why don’t you pray to God and ask Him to make it all clear to you - or at least to open your closed mind? It’s all there in books, the history of the Church, and writings of the Fathers (1st through 5th centuries). That is how I learned. You can, too, if you want to. But I don’t think you do.
And the Muslim’s have their own extra books, and the Mormons have their own extra books. But true Christians stick with God’s word.
**Im sorry, I dont have time.**
Oh, OK. Go feed your crickets.
And who forsook who on that cross?
Proposition 1: as regards his Godhead, begotten of the Father before the agesNow, you are right to warn against separation into two persons. If you actually read the link I provided you on Nestorius, you will see there is an excellent argument he would absolutely agree with the two of us on that point. Unfortunately, there was a language barrier, and things got badly muddled, just as is happening here. You see how I repeatedly protest that I (like any other Protestant here) am not advocating two persons at all. Yet our protests go unheeded. You are confused if you think that is what we are advocating. I advise you to take a deep breath, relax, and read what we are actually saying. I don't enjoy misunderstandings.
Proposition 2: as regards his manhood begotten, for us men and for our salvation, of Mary the Virgin, the God-bearer
Proposition 3: the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the unionProposition three, the distinction theorem, allows us to go back to propositions 1 and 2 and admit a critical distinction between the two natures, their origin. This entire discussion revolves around that one, tiny point. If you admit, as you must, that the origin of the divine nature and the human nature are distinct, then you permit that distinction to survive in how we speak of Mary. The whole point of introducing Theotokus in the first place was NOT to establish an attribute of Mary, but to refute errors concerning Christ and His divinity. No Christian will disagree that Jesus, from the moment of conception, was fully human and fully divine. Theotokus ensures the confessor understands who Jesus was while yet in the womb, the God-man.
>
>> “What I was saying was that St. Paul indicates that in the early Church there were doctrines which were not written down and the Trinity was one of them.” <<
.
Again:
By what source do you ‘know’ this thing that is completely absent from scripture?
.
.
Let the dead do their laundry! - Take up your (whatever) and teach us!
.
It's not a matter of denying anything. Notice to whom He is speaking when He speaks. All through His ministry, through His Passion and Resurrection. The Day of Pentecost.
It's always to some or all of the Apostles. Paul's epistles are addressed to churches. The common thread is that He deals with groups, not individuals. The pattern is OT and confirmed by Paul to the church at Corinth..."at the mouth of two or three witnesses..."
The first council in Acts 15 has been discussed here many times. There was a pattern laid down. So there is certainly scripture to support the convening of the bishops to seek the Holy Spirit about disputed matters.
Transferring everything committed and promised to the Church to the individual is going to create confusion. Beyond puzzling over why Jesus did not tell the Apostles to write it all down, I ask what about the Christians who had no New Testament? Answer: They were to be in the Church and as Paul says over and over, act and believe like HE had done told them to act. and believe
When, exactly did the common practice of the early church, as shown above, get negated? By what authority?
You do understand that Paul was writing epistles when he wrote this ??.. so the writings he was talking about was the Old Testament,
and hold the traditions which ye have been taught] Hold is an emphatic word: stand firm and hold fast (Ellicott) gives the Greek sense more adequately. In traditions which you were taught there is no suggestion of the Romanist idea of Tradition, conceived as an authority distinct from the written Word of God; for the Apostle continues, whether by word or latter of ours (the pronoun belongs to both nouns). He bids them hold by what he had taught, whether it came through this channel or that, provided it were really from himself (comp. 2 Thessalonians 2:2, and ch. 2 Thessalonians 3:14; 2 Thessalonians 3:17). He is now beginning to communicate with the Churches by letter, and stamps his Epistles with the authority of his spoken word. The sentence asserts the claim of the true Apostolic teaching, as against any who would beguile the Church away from it. Comp. 1 Corinthians 11:2 : I praise you that in all things you remember us, and hold fast the traditions, even as I delivered them to you.(Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges)
BTW the quote you used is NOT 2 Thes 2:14 it is 2:15
So then, brothers and sisters, stand firm and hold fast to the teachings WE passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter.
Not to worry; for GOD, himself; gave the words to CORRECT the KJV to Joseph before he foolishly walked into that jail and ran his mouth off.
Color coding explanation:
Added stuff... Changed stuff... Rearranged stuff... Removed stuff...
*(UNDERLINED stuff is the DISTRACTING reference on every tenth word or so that infuses LDS 'scripture' online.)
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.