[PieterCasparzen]

” not to Spurgeon or any other theologian. On each point, if they agree with the Bible, I agree with them. If not, I don’t.”

So you’re saying Spurgeon was anti-biblical? He believed in sola scriptura. You probably do too. Yet you can’t agree?

Vlad, your twisting is obvious to all readers. I say I evaluate my agreement on a point-by-point basis, and your immediate response is to accuse me of saying "Spurgeon was anti-biblical", i.e., you seek to get me to agree with everything Spurgeon every wrote or none of it at all ?

This argument is a good thing, it will get more Roman Catholics to start thinking about the falsehoods of Papal doctrine.

[vladimir998]

“Vlad, your twisting is obvious to all readers.”

You’re the one twisting things.

You say one thing. Spurgeon says another.

Who is correct: you or Spurgeon? Yet you both used sola scriptura.