God bless this Church.
They did not refuse to hold the funeral because the woman was a sexual deviant, they refused because the family wanted to show a video containing homosexual kissing.
These people define their existance by their sexual escapades. To want to force that filth to be shown on an Altar is discusting.
They have to use a funeral to show homosexuality, is there no bounds for these people and good for the church.
Homosexuals need to grasp the simple fact that just because activist judges are on their side it does not mean most of the country agrees with them or their agenda even if the media does
Well put. It seems to me that heterosexuals tend to define their existence in much broader categories. Yes, their gender and their attraction for the opposite sex is a big part of their identity, but so is their occupation, their family roles and relationships, their religion, their ethnic background, their interests and hobbies, their nationality. But to most homosexuals, it is as if their homosexuality is the whole pie. And that whole pie must not only be accepted. It must be celebrated whether you agree with it or not.