Hmmmm, I don’t see the connection between what you’ve posted and the reference to lexicography. What I see is more of the typical avoidance of Pauline soteriology as clearly spelled out in Romans. I was raised with these arguments in my family. I pretty much know how this works. One person I knew genuinely believed Paul shouldn’t have been in the canon. But that’s not the answer. He’s a duly appointed apostle, and he addressed the issue head on in Romans, and his teaching there does not conflict with either Hebrews or James. Whereas your writer is just offering up the standard treatment of Hebrews by those who can’t deal with what Paul is saying in Romans. He’s picking a winner. It doesn’t work. They all have to be right, and they all have to be explained. Still waiting ....
Peace,
SR
Why do Catholics not get the fact that faith appropriates salvation. All the other stuff is simply evidence of that faith.