Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Our man in washington

A reasonable reading of Genesis 1:26 suggests that Adam and Eve were not the first humans created.


I think it is reasonable to believe that Adam was not in the sixt5h day creation but later.


77 posted on 11/24/2014 3:19:58 PM PST by ravenwolf (` Does the scripture explain it in full detail? if not how can you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: ravenwolf

>> “I think it is reasonable to believe that Adam was not in the sixth day creation but later.” <<

.
That sounds like catholic talk for sure!

Reasonable to disbelieve God?
.


84 posted on 11/24/2014 3:25:12 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: ravenwolf

“I think it is reasonable to believe that Adam was not in the sixt5h day creation but later.”

The sixth day was the last day of creation, so there was no later, as far as that goes.


226 posted on 11/25/2014 9:24:30 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: ravenwolf
A reasonable reading of Genesis 1:26 suggests that Adam and Eve were not the first humans created.

OH??


Then God said, "Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

264 posted on 11/25/2014 12:37:23 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson