[ealgeone]

So I guess you're done then? When a protestant has nothing left but a flippant remark (or a picture) then I can only come to the conclusion that we've gone as far as their particular brand of fundamentalism allows them to go. The intersection of the theological with the secular.

It's really a fascinating phenomenon to behold when protestants have exhausted what limited theological knowledge they possess and revert to that which seems to hold sway in the secular world. You'd think they would go farther, exploring the deep richness of Christian theology. Unfortunately it just goes back to the same tired old juvenile refrains. Ultimately expressing the secular nature of Protestantism.

Nope. It's impossible to reason with anyone who denies the facts about mary worship as you do.

You denied there were idols of mary....I provided these.

You still deny.

And then you attempt to shift the conversation in typical alinsky tactics so that tells me you can't deny these images. as I said, there's lots more of these and you know it.

[JPX2011]

You denied there were idols of mary....I provided these. You still deny. And then you attempt to shift the conversation in typical alinsky tactics so that tells me you can't deny these images. as I said, there's lots more of these and you know it.

I denied your interpretative philosophy regarding those images. Because you can't prove that the focal point of those images is a deity to be worshiped. Can you say that? I suppose you could, but it doesn't make it so.

You can post all the images you want but unless you can prove the underlying premise which is these are deities being worshiped then you're engaging in nothing but liberal propaganda.