[JPX2011]

You denied there were idols of mary....I provided these. You still deny. And then you attempt to shift the conversation in typical alinsky tactics so that tells me you can't deny these images. as I said, there's lots more of these and you know it.

I denied your interpretative philosophy regarding those images. Because you can't prove that the focal point of those images is a deity to be worshiped. Can you say that? I suppose you could, but it doesn't make it so.

You can post all the images you want but unless you can prove the underlying premise which is these are deities being worshiped then you're engaging in nothing but liberal propaganda.

[ealgeone]

>You denied there were idols of mary....I provided these. You still deny. And then you attempt to shift the conversation in typical alinsky tactics so that tells me you can't deny these images. as I said, there's lots more of these and you know it.<

I denied your interpretative philosophy regarding those images. Because you can't prove that the focal point of those images is a deity to be worshiped. Can you say that? I suppose you could, but it doesn't make it so.

You can post all the images you want but unless you can prove the underlying premise which is these are deities being worshiped then you're engaging in nothing but liberal propaganda.

Wow. Just. Wow.

As I said...denial is a river in Egypt.

And yes, I'm done with this conversation with you.

And I thought obama was obtuse.