Msgr Pope ping
Oh, I think I can beat it:
PIV is always rape, ok?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/3108209/posts
Good gravy.
Analysis: A few people have minds are out of sync with their genitals for whatever reason. So to make sure those people are not uncomfortable, we have to mess up all children’s heads the same way.
I must say, I have never read anything stranger in my lifebump
It is called reality - boy or girl, as the design is intended.
Occasionally we have developmental deformities, but that’s just another reality - face it or go insane. Seems some people have such a hard time with reality, they insist others share in their shortcoming.
Bingo. Have you been reading the news, Msgr. Pope? People have lost their jobs for holding the belief that a coworker who was a man yesterday is still a man today, even though he's wearing a dress and heels ... and most people who are aware of it cheer, because they've been taught that there is no reality, per se, only individual perceptions.
See where this leads? "There never was such a person as Leon Trotsky, comrade."
This doesn’t even address the brutal practice of species assignment.
I guess she must think that the womb is a sort of Schrodinger’s box, where the baby is neither male nor female until someone looks at it, at which point the probability cloud collapses into a reality?
If that is the case, then how would she avoid gaining any knowledge of the child’s genitalia? She has to change diapers, after all. And how will she keep the child from discovering which set of genitalia he or she has and thereby collapsing the probability cloud him/herself?
I’m all for keeping the gender of the baby a mystery all through pregnancy. It’s nice to have a little surprise waiting after all that labor. But not knowing the gender doesn’t mean there isn’t one!
Ping!
I have never ascribed to the I am responsible for what happens in my life mantra which is obviously a complete characterization of the human condition. I ascribe to the steel ball in the pinball machine of life theory.
Let’s let an expert on the left, David Horowitz, explain. In his book Radicals, he devoted a long chapter to Alinsky, containing the following telling excerpts:The focus on power was illustrated by an anecdote recounted in a New Republic article that appeared during Obama’s [2008] presidential campaign. “When Alinsky would ask new students why they wanted to organize, they would invariably respond with selfless bromides about wanting to help others. Alinsky would then scream back at them that there was a one-word answer: “You want to organize for power!” In Rules for Radicals, Alinsky wrote: “From the moment an organizer enters a community he lives, dreams, eats, breathes, sleeps only one thing, and that is to build the mass power base of what he calls the army.”…Guided by these principles, Alinsky’s disciples are misperceived as idealists; in fact, they are practiced Machiavellians. Their focus is invariably on means rather than ends. As a result they are not bound by organizational orthodoxies or theoretical dogmatisms in the way their still admired Marxist forebears were. Within the framework of their revolutionary agendas, they are flexible and opportunistic and will say anything (and pretend to be anything) to get what they want, which is power.
http://neoneocon.com/2013/05/17/remember-obamas-an-alinskyite/
I’ve been saying this is their next step. If Junior can decide to be the opposite sex at age 3 and have Mom, Dad, and Doctor play along, why bother with the pink and blue for newborns? And for people who think gender roles are an evil social construct to be broken, why then do they support these mentally ill people in choosing to be classically masculine or feminine?
This scenario is already playing out in Sweden, where at least one couple has refused to tell even close relatives the baby’s sex, wanting to raise it ‘gender neutral’ or whatever.
Author of Slate article - Christin Scarlett Milloy
(I'm thinking her next article might point out the vicious, despotic tyranny of parents -- I mean, the two breeding agents -- who will later dictatorially impose potty-training on their gender-imposed spawn, even if their offspring chooses not to go down that "potty-trained" route.)