Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

I guess she must think that the womb is a sort of Schrodinger’s box, where the baby is neither male nor female until someone looks at it, at which point the probability cloud collapses into a reality?

If that is the case, then how would she avoid gaining any knowledge of the child’s genitalia? She has to change diapers, after all. And how will she keep the child from discovering which set of genitalia he or she has and thereby collapsing the probability cloud him/herself?

I’m all for keeping the gender of the baby a mystery all through pregnancy. It’s nice to have a little surprise waiting after all that labor. But not knowing the gender doesn’t mean there isn’t one!


12 posted on 07/31/2014 3:17:30 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

Each time “gender” appears in your post, it should be replaced with “sex.”

I read the article at “Slate”; the author’s a barking moonbat.


13 posted on 07/31/2014 3:20:26 AM PDT by Tax-chick (No power in the 'verse can stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
She could always put an “Elizabethan” dog collar on the kid until he reaches 21.
23 posted on 07/31/2014 4:29:04 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson