- "...I don’t think..."
You could have stopped there.
- All of that is nothing short of a rant attack on us and has NOTHING to do with “that freedom”.
I included you in reply, for reason that you responded to a comment made to me here.
In reply to another having said “And the truth shall set you free” you spoke of [religious] bondage;
- "Which is exactly why these anti-Catholics are in such mental bondage."
A "rant attack" huh? In reality your own off-hand comment could well enough be perceived to having been referring to myself, since your reply was a chiming in sort of thing, insinuating that myself and others were in "mental" bondage.
I was merely correcting the record away from what does appear to me to be a case of psychological (and spiritual?) projection onto myself, a thing which according to the Lord Himself-- I am "free" of being subject to. 
Which makes my own reply to you, be response to what could well be perceived as "attack" on both metmom and myself, for we were both previously parties to the conversation.
Be more careful in your own off-hand comments in the future -- and things could be a bit more peaceful around here.
Next time, get a warrant. Or get off my porch.