It seems to me that this makes perfect sense given the New Testament fulfills the Old. Christ fulfilled the Old Law. By believing this, we don't suggest God has to destroy all of his works and go back and do it over , do we?
“”Sabbath” did not change. It was replaced.”
That is not biblical either. No where in the Bible can you support that.
But if you read subsequent posts you would learn that technically the “Sabbath” did not change. It was replaced.
The day of Pentecost came on Sunday, the first day of the week, it was not a day of rest in fact it was just the opposite of rest it was a new beginning.
How any one can equate that with the Sabbath is beyond my understanding.
The new beginning on the day of Pentecost can be equated with the first day of creation, but it can not be equated with the seventh day which is the day of rest.
The new beginning at Pentecost fulfills the new covenant foretold in Jeremiah 31:31-33, and is explained in Hebrews.
Replacing or changing the day of the Sabbath would be no different than doing the same thing to Pentecost, they are two different events.