Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BipolarBob; Mr Rogers
Even the Apostle Peter was married

Scripture mentions Peter's mother in law; hence, he had a wife. However, she is nowhere mentioned. I find this strange. Imagine the scene. There is the mother-in-law, lying in bed. At her side, as one would expect, is her dutiful daughter—except that Matthew and Luke make no reference to her daughter. Leaving her out of the story is strange. It is not the way a writer would be expected to handle the incident, since a daughter usually is the one most frantic about a mother’s condition. The story is tantalizingly brief. Maybe the Evangelists decided to leave out all but the most salient facts. Or maybe it was because Peter’s wife wasn’t there—she already may have died. I think this is the most likely explanation for her non-appearance.

197 posted on 06/23/2014 2:08:45 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: NYer; Mr Rogers
"Evangelists decided to leave out all but the most salient facts. Or maybe it was because Peter’s wife wasn’t there—she already may have died.I think this is the most likely explanation for her non-appearance.

Where oh where is that YOPIOS cereal box jpg.? Instead of saying Evangelists decide to leave out replace it with Catholics decide to add to. A lot of things aren't mentioned in the Bible. It just means that . . . they weren't mentioned , that's all. Peters wife wasn't important to his job as apostle.

231 posted on 06/23/2014 4:04:42 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Obama - The Scandal a Week President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; BipolarBob; Mr Rogers
Scripture mentions Peter's mother in law; hence, he had a wife. However, she is nowhere mentioned. I find this strange. Imagine the scene. There is the mother-in-law, lying in bed. At her side, as one would expect, is her dutiful daughter—except that Matthew and Luke make no reference to her daughter. Leaving her out of the story is strange. It is not the way a writer would be expected to handle the incident, since a daughter usually is the one most frantic about a mother’s condition. The story is tantalizingly brief. Maybe the Evangelists decided to leave out all but the most salient facts. Or maybe it was because Peter’s wife wasn’t there—she already may have died. I think this is the most likely explanation for her non-appearance.

1 Corinthians 9:3-5 This is my defense to those who would examine me. Do we not have the right to eat and drink? Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?

Peter took along his believing wife with him as he ministered.

So much for your Bible knowledge.

247 posted on 06/23/2014 7:28:32 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson