Are you denying that Miriam/Mary gave birth to a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron or do hold that she had no pain during the birth and so it could not be her ? Your comments do not make sense to me.
Yours is the religion that claims Mary didn't endure any pain during childbirth...That alone disqualifies her from being the Woman in Rev. 12...
While Mary was a woman and she bore the one who it is said will rule with a rod of iron, Mary is not the only one who is said to be a woman who would bore a man child who will rule with a rod of iron...
And nothing else is this discourse about the woman could possibly apply to Mary, the mother of Jesus...So it has to apply to the other one which fits the bill for the rest of the discourse...
Pretty simple for the person who searches the scriptures for the answer instead of that popular, faulty commentary, your catechism...