I don’t disagree with anything he said and that quite in particular I don’t have any issue with at all. There’s another quote though where he disparaged homosexual activity with, to say the least, salty language. It can’t be repeated in the Religion Forum.
That is what I was referring to in my previous post. There’s charity and then there’s just being crude. The quote I’m talking about is both; I’m just saying the crudity can be eliminated. A graphic description of the act is not needed when condemning it.
I disagree.
By allowing the Left to sugar-coat it with euphemisms such as "marriage equality", and "gay marriage" and "love", we enable the brainwashing of the common folk, who know in their hearts that a man masturbating inside another man's $4!7hole is not a marital act.