[PhilipFreneau]

>>>No, the "times" didn't change, just the proper thread for discussing the subject instead of hijacking one already deep in disputing a false gospel.<<<

There you go again, mischaracterizing what happened in that older thread. Why not present the whole story, instead of presenting only your heavily biased opinion of it?

Have you already forgotten that I only responded to new-age doctrine that had, in itself, hijacked a thread? Or was their new-age doctrine pre-authorized to hijack a tread, but not mine?

What are your rules for this forum, boatbums?

Philip

[boatbums]

Oh, please! Even a cursory read through "that" thread easily shows that your input was acknowledged, discussed and then, only when you continued to drag the subject on and on with a thread STARTED by Catholics to mock the disunity of all non-Catholic Christians, were you repeatedly asked to start a NEW thread where the subject could be properly addressed. That is no heavily biased description, simply the truth - take it or leave it.

Will you answer my question about THIS thread (reminder: can we discuss the topic respectfully without insults)? I don't see any point in talking about my views of dispensationalism if the only thing I can expect to get back is snark and condescension. I'd rather not waste my time.