Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilipFreneau; CynicalBear; redleghunter; GarySpFc
Oh, please! Even a cursory read through "that" thread easily shows that your input was acknowledged, discussed and then, only when you continued to drag the subject on and on with a thread STARTED by Catholics to mock the disunity of all non-Catholic Christians, were you repeatedly asked to start a NEW thread where the subject could be properly addressed. That is no heavily biased description, simply the truth - take it or leave it.

Will you answer my question about THIS thread (reminder: can we discuss the topic respectfully without insults)? I don't see any point in talking about my views of dispensationalism if the only thing I can expect to get back is snark and condescension. I'd rather not waste my time.

131 posted on 02/23/2014 7:14:07 PM PST by boatbums (Simul justis et peccator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: boatbums

>>>>Even a cursory read through “that” thread easily shows that your input was acknowledged, discussed and then, only when you continued to drag the subject on and on with a thread STARTED by Catholics to mock the disunity of all non-Catholic Christians, were you repeatedly asked to start a NEW thread where the subject could be properly addressed.<<<<

Cursory? Is this your definition of CURSORY: “I will pretend like I know what is going on, and then attack the guy who disagrees with me?”

That is the only way I could squeeze your explanation out of what really happened. You made it up, boatbums. So please refrain from any more false witnessing against me.

Philip


134 posted on 02/24/2014 8:14:58 AM PST by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson