I would rather vote against all abortions. At least the law you imagined here would be a first step.
Well, yes, but that was the point of my question.
I am of the opinion that abortion after rape or incest will never be outlawed (or, if you prefer, will be the last pro-death bastion to fall after America undergoes an enormous conversion of heart).
Since I believe that, I regard arguments like this one as distractions from incremental improvements with the potential to save millions of lives.
So, I'm interested in how people who want to MAKE the argument that such abortions must be outlawed view incremental change.