Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

You have hit the thumb on the nail...

Science as re-invented the arguments, redefined the topics and sanitized them for their own purposes. This is the same thing Stephen Meyer faces when he debates “scientists” about intelligent design. Call it cellular encoding and its genetic biochemistry; Call it God directed and it is cheap dogma.

Their blindness is deep and widespread. But, I suspect that this may be part of the “...deluding influence so that they might believe what is false.” Paul wrote about in IIThess. Great post.


92 posted on 01/18/2014 12:28:28 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Dutchboy88

...gather about them a great number of teachers...


206 posted on 01/21/2014 12:59:41 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchboy88
Science as re-invented the arguments, redefined the topics and sanitized them for their own purposes.

It appears that way: “Schäfer’s book is an integrative approach to Modern Science and Religion that aims to show how some traditional religious and philosophical notions can be understood or redefined in terms of modern science.

237 posted on 01/22/2014 2:58:30 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson