What his answer REALLY means? No. It’s a lie intended to draw someone into their cultish meandering thought processes.
Now that same group has a caucus tag. Of course, he might simply use the caucus tag as originally proposed, for christians who consider Saturday to be the Sabbath. But how do you respond to the TEACHINGS if those TEACHINGS are so buried but the responder is operating in the open on FR?
Then it appears you have a job to do. Dig them out for us all to see.
Claims and assertions about stuff don't go very far on FR without actual DATA to back them up and/or blow them apart.
It isn't FR's job to be 'Policeman of the World'; it's the PEOPLE who frequent it's pages to blow the whistle, so to speak.
And when his disciples James and John saw it, they said, “Lord, do you want us to tell fire to come down from heaven and consume them?”
Then it appears you have a job to do. Dig them out for us all to see.
***Here is where it happened. Notice how the recipient of the post issued crickets but now he’s opening “sabbatarian” caucus threads.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3107566/posts?page=343#343
Thanks to Greetings_puny_humans for bringing me up to speed on this latest tactic. In the past, I had noticed that various cults would finally say No to the question of “Do you accept that Jesus is (Jehovah) God?” I had asked JW’s the question and they would say yes, Jesus is God, but when asked if they think Jesus is Jehovah God, they say no. Even Bahai faith, who will say they believe in Buddha, Mohammed, Jesus, Moses, Confucius (basically everybody) ... those guys will finally say, “No, Jesus is not God”. This was my first exposure to the UCG cult which seems organized around a very fine antitrinitarian viewpoint.
But to answer your question - But how do you respond to the TEACHINGS if those TEACHINGS are so buried but the responder is operating in the open on FR? - start a thread, point out the problems, call the Mods.
***I have started threads in the past on the deity of Christ. I have kept up a keyword of ‘historicity’. This latest twist is new to me and the right person to open up such a thread is someone familiar with the UCG heresy.