You're right, it is/was. Its design is to drive a wedge between pro-life Christians and their denomination. It's an attempt to persuade them that ONLY the Roman Catholic Church has consistency on this subject (though only a minority actually follows the church's dictates) and that this one issue is enough to conclude that it must be right about everything else. We know that is false and will not fall for such a blatant ruse.
We know that is false and will not fall for such a blatant ruse."
Ah, stating facts is a "ruse". That's a new low.
Particularly when included in a mind reading exercise attributing motives not in evidence to the individual who posted the article as well as to others.