I notice you like to cut off the rest of others’ quotes so that all that is left is “How can it be hypothetical” rather than responding to the full quote/point about said hypothetical.
My response (208) is close to the question (207) and I don’t want to clutter the thread with repetitions. Generally, I invite the reader to read the post being answered in full and not rely to a short marker that indicates the focus of the response.
I think by now all of you three have said everything you’ve got to say about it, and many times each, and I keep responding to your agitated incomprehension quite patiently. If somehow I missed something still, by all means, point it out to me.