Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Hieronymus
it requires decisions, programmes, mechanisms and processes specifically geared to a better distribution of income,

Neither complex, nor nuanced.

Game. Set. Match.

Goodbye.

28 posted on 11/29/2013 5:30:30 PM PST by FredZarguna (The sequel, thoroughly pointless, derivative, and boring was like all James Cameron "films.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

He makes a distinction between welfare (handouts) and income. He believes that in many situations welfare needs to be diminished and income increased. He holds that situations that do not do this are not long-term solutions, and a program of prosperity that involves putting more people on welfare so that the remainder may have a higher income is not a good thing.

Do you prefer the government making decisions, and creating mechanisms and processes that lead to people with no income but surviving on welfare?


30 posted on 11/29/2013 5:47:07 PM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson