[StormPrepper]

The problem with this logic is that it assumes that every prophet that ever lived is named in the books chosen to be in the Bible.

Also when ever a prophesy mentions a known prophet from the past they are called by name. Prophets of the future are not called by name.

The two prophets spoken of in Rev 11 are not known to the world. Or are known but not accept by the world. Plus the Muslim world recognizes the Old Testament prophets as prophets and would fall down at their feet if they showed up.

These two prophets are not and will not be accepted by the Catholic Church or Evangelical Christianity or any of the Protestant denominations.

The first thing a true prophet does is testify of Jesus Christ. The second thing is they correct doctrinal mistakes. They teach truth. So 95% of "traditional" Christianity will reject them outright. Especially on the doctrine of infant Baptism.

It's the absolute law of God that if you reject the servant you reject the master who sent him. Even in the small amount of things we have recorded of the conversations of Jesus, He mentions this twice. So in reality He must have talked about it a lot.

Matt 7:
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

People that believed and professed that Jesus is Lord, and had the faith to many great things, but were cast off at the judgement anyway.

[Campion]

There’s not a verse of Scripture that says that the “two witnesses” will say a single word on the topic of infant baptism.

[colorcountry]

1. We thank thee, O God, for a prophet
To guide us in these latter days.
We thank thee for sending the gospel
To lighten our minds with its rays.
We thank thee for every blessing
Bestowed by thy bounteous hand.
We feel it a pleasure to serve thee
And love to obey thy command.

LDS.org

[Elsie]

The first thing a true prophet does is testify of Jesus Christ. The second thing is they correct doctrinal mistakes.

How does one detect a FALSE prophet??