This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 11/10/2013 7:10:12 PM PST by Religion Moderator, reason:
This article will not be allowed on the Religion Forum because it mongers hatred much like the false Jesuit Oath: |
Posted on 11/10/2013 10:01:37 AM PST by JosephJames
I think you are mistaken.
You might want to reconsider this, since you're describing the Vatican as well, lol.
I continue to honour my oath not to divulge the ceremonials of the Masons, however, I will not participate or encourage the participation in, Masonic practices.
ROTFL! If you really want to discuss Catholic conspiracy theories about how the Jews elected Obama, I'm perfectly willing to go there. Are you?
I also saw that you also didnt apologize for Barak Obama, Jesse Jackson and bill Clinton in your failed save.
What do I have to apologize for? If we're supposed to believe what Catholics tell us about Protestants, there's 41,000 different denominations who each believe the others are going to Hell. Why should I apologize for the voting behavior of another group (again, if you can believe the Catholics) that I think is going to Hell?
I also think debate by hyperlink is the modus of the intellectual lightweight.
That's a lot of thoughts. You might want to pop the hood and check your fluid levels.
Why reconsider? If the shoe fits...?
HOWEVER:
How in the sam hill Catholics who believe in a World Masonic Conspiracy can then turn right around and make fun of Fundamentalist Protestants for not believing in evolution or in "higher criticism" is absolutely beyond me. In fact, it's downright crazy.
Anyone who believes the Masons are secretly conquering the world to make it G-dless can good and well believe in creationism and letter-for-letter Divine authorship. There's no excuse, people.
Laughing and Pointing at each other gets us nowhere.
“How in the sam hill Catholics who believe in a World Masonic Conspiracy can then turn right around and make fun of Fundamentalist Protestants for not believing in evolution or in “higher criticism” is absolutely beyond me. In fact, it’s downright crazy.”
Really? Why? The two things are completely unrelated.
No one who claims the Holy Torah is a tissue of lies written by bloodthirsty savages who adapted Babylonian/Canaanite mythology deserve the slightest bit of understanding or respect. There are only two kinds of people who could possibly believe this: the ignorant, and the evil.
Laughing and Pointing at each other gets us nowhere.
I wasn't laughing at the original poster or the article. I specifically said it could be 100% true. But anyone who can believe in such a theory who suddenly morphs into a scientific modernist when it comes to the Biblical text is a buffoon and a walking contradiction.
I meant that in general, laughing at someone who believes in creationism doesn't help their cause.
How in the sam hill Catholics who believe in a World Masonic Conspiracy can then turn right around and make fun of Fundamentalist Protestants for not believing in evolution or in higher criticism is absolutely beyond me. In fact, its downright crazy.
Really? Why? The two things are completely unrelated.
Really? A person can be a screaming Right Wing Extremist when it comes to the Masons and yet a iconoclastic liberal skeptic when it comes to the Biblical text? You don't see any tension whatsoever between the two?
Your religion is screwed up, pal.
Hey . . . maybe creationism is a "Masonic plot!"
And yet most Catholics do precisely that. Never mind that by the same standards none of the miracles of the "new testament" could have possibly happened. To be a "good Catholic" you apparently have to make metaphorical love to Charles Darwin and Julius Wellhausen.
I repeat: anyone who can be right wing enough to believe in a World Masonic Conspiracy but who laughs at Genesis is an incredibly screwed-up person.
Heh...looks like something that the mullahs in Iran would say. Maybe they are related from those Persian campaigns and long occupations around the northeastern Mediterranean.
“Really? A person can be a screaming Right Wing Extremist when it comes to the Masons and yet a iconoclastic liberal skeptic when it comes to the Biblical text?”
Of course - because the two are so unrelated that your characterization as “Right Wing Extremist” and “iconoclastic liberal skeptic” on those issues simply doesn’t work. Someone can be a lefty and dislike the Masons - in fact I know quite a few who do.
“You don’t see any tension whatsoever between the two?”
Nope. Not one bit.
“Your religion is screwed up, pal.”
Nope. Only your thinking is. You are making associations where none exist.
“Hey . . . maybe creationism is a “Masonic plot!””
No, but I wouldn’t be surprised if you were to wake up tomorrow and claim it is.
The poster you responded to said nothing about Catholics, much less that God hates them.
It's more honest to respond to something another poster said instead of making it look like they said something completely different.
Now that is "Truly unbelievable nonsense" and looks like mind reading. Is it ok for Catholics to do that?
More highly placed and educated Catholics believe Freemasons to be old Protestant and Jewish “Judaizers.” One needs to read between the lines and pay attention to their actions to understand.
Meanwhile, some related Wikipedia pages haven’t been molested by the kooks, yet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tubal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_Iberia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meshech
Granted, those bunches are spread all over the planet now. The descendants of those crazy tribes continue to get their cooties all over the Gog/Magog pages, though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooties
One of your friends caught a "higher up" stealing a host? How did your friend retrieve the host without touching it him/herself?
A host heist? Follow the crumbs...
The only problem with your theory is that the Catholic Church has always been at odds with masonism, since long before the advent of modern liberalism. Incidentally, I wouldn't be surprised if Pelosi is a mason. Its seems that quite a few members of governing circles are.
Given Nan’s heritage (Lombardi/D’Allesandro) more likely the Mafia, LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.