“The rest of the claims, I think, are largely satisfied with what has already been provided, especially by one of their own Cardinals in Luther’s day.”
You probably mean Cardinal Cajetan - and on that score he was as wrong as Luther. It wasn’t the only thing he was wrong on either. The issue was decided long before he was born, however, so it simply didn’t matter what his view was in that regard.
You might want to read Sid Leimann’s book, The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture.
“Anything else is simply revisionist history on the part of the RCC.”
Nope.
You might want to read Sid Z. Leiman’s book, The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture.
“You probably mean Cardinal Cajetan - and on that score he was as wrong as Luther.”
And your evidence of that is Rome’s modern day claims, but the historical record doesn’t support it.
“You might want to read Sid Leimann’s book, The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture.”
If he’s as offensive as what comes off the Vatican’s own website, I’m not sure that I’ll want to.