Posted on 10/11/2013 6:51:02 AM PDT by colorcountry
I find it interesting that a Baptist would defend the Mormon Church myself...
If you say so. But the words “sound doctrine” from a LDS member made me chuckle...
If you get an answer, ping me, I wasn’t getting it either.
The mass exodus within the Mormon church (thank God) continues!
What? It doesn't endorse Scientology either? Or Wiccan witches? Or Baptists who love to cite Buddhists?
And it doesn't endorse giraffe-icon lovin' ecumenical religionists?
(Of course, such people can still join Bahai...at least they more openly water down everything everybody believes in its attempted show of unification)
That isn’t a spank at all.
You guys forgot that FR doesn’t support Islam either. Tsk, tsk!
Laotzu's line of conservative thought that seems to underlie what can be at times bizarre comments tend to run along the lines of:
(a) The liberal media commonly bashes religion, especially the religious right.
(b) Mormonism is one piece of that religious right.
(c) Conclusion: Therefore, anybody who takes issue with Mormonism = equivalency of liberal media.
Of course, we know (c) doesn't necessarily follow (a) & (b) -- otherwise the Moonies could NEVER be theologically critiqued by anybody either because back in the 80s & into the early 90s, they, too, were heavily swimming in socio-political conservative circles...
We have seen on FR other FREEPERS who -- when a liberal media source was the source of a given Mormon thread -- have taken the op to bash that source as indeed "liberal"...and then they write off everything from that source.
Of course, if they lived next door to such a liberal; and the liberal knocked on their door at night upon seeing significant black smoke & flames coming from a portion of the house whose door was being knocked, I'd kind of find hard to believe the conservative would answer the door and say, "No, I don't believe you; you're a liberal; I'm going back to bed."
Liberals are usually 98%+ wrong on their perceived so-called "answers" to problems; but occasionally they at least are partially clued in to assessing some basic problems staring them in the face.
Some weathermen & pilots & paramedics & doctors are liberal, too. It doesn't mean that conservatives always ask them which they are before listening to their assessments or retaining their services at times.
So...given the Moonies' past socio-political conservatism (Moon was a for a time incarcerated by Communists), I suppose were enough Moonie expose' articles to pop up on FR, there Laotzu would be...with personal attacks, giraffe images, and hurled accusations of "liberals" toward anybody who dared to mention that Moon himself was the Messiah.
Not very "pro-religion" of them to do so...
Well, Muslims aren't very pro-abortion or pro-homosexuality, either. And...we hear they are VERY
So, Laotzu...given that reality...where exactly have you been hidin' out on all the anti-Muslim threads & comments ... and THOUSANDS of comments on FR???
If Muslims are so conservative on key social issues, why haven't you had the Muslims' back on FR?
Where have you been layin' low -- and why?
Where's your sense of standin' up to all those FR "bullies" who digitally pick on Islam?
If, as you seem to claim in posts #19 & #27 that you are so "pro-religion" that you take issue with both conservative & liberal sources who allegedly "bash" any given religion with some conservative leanings, where have you been on all these Muslim threads?
Obama's been linked THOUSANDS of times on FR threads to Islam in some way.
Why haven't you had his back at least on these particular Muslim-related comments in the same way you've at times rushed in to defend Romney's Mormonism?
We're just puzzled, Laotzu over this seeming HUGE gap in your level of religious consistency & coherency here...
You can quote Tao Te Ching Post #156 and Lao tzu [same thread, post #121] ... so where are all your Muslim leader quotations, too...and other cultists?
Here, Laotzu you come across quite religiously tolerant & "ecumenical" (well, granted not toward us but hey, religious tolerance only goes so far as a "virtue" right???) ...
...yet your home page has yet to grab a quote from the...
...thousands of world religions & their offshoots,
...cults & sects,
...folk religions,
...pagan polytheistic groups,
...ancient legends & mythologies,
...occultic groups,
...gurus -- self-help & otherwise,
...esoteric & mystical bands,
...& religious-oriented philosophers
...out there from time immemorial...
...ya might to get busy ... 'cause they are not yet getting equal visibility on your home page when you ONLY quote Lds "prophet" Ezra Taft Benson among all the cultist leaders out there that you have to choose from...
Can't really be fully religiously "ecumenical" if you're going to slight so many thousands of groups & worldviews, now can you?!
“Are we a cult too? Should I seek God’s forgiveness, and your approval?”
If you’re a Baptist, you’re not a member of a cult. But if you are a Mormon, you are indeed a member of a cult, since you deny the unique deity of Jesus Christ, profess that there are many gods, and that you will become a god after your death if you are worthy enough for it, amongst many other blasphemous and stupid opinions.
“Three in one, sometimes three, sometimes one,”
No, sorry, there is only one God, and you will not become a God after you die, nor get to have sex for all eternity to populate your own planet.
I know it’s a downer, but it’s time to move on.
Let's stop getting theology from a Dan brown novel shall we?
The councils to which you refer were validating what was already accepted by the church in response to heretical teachings. Not unlike the teachings the Mormon Church puts forth today.
It's what I cut my teeth on, but one can take only so many 'wist thou not' phrases until the mental translation of King James authorized translation language into modern English becomes a chore instead of a joy.
THEN a person (me) will reach for a more readable and understandable version.
EXCEPT for the 23rd Psalm and a few other verses.
The newer translations may be a 'bit' more accurate there, but they SOUND awful!
Since you asked - #8 below
The Articles of Faith outline 13 basic points of belief of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The Prophet Joseph Smith first wrote them in a letter to John Wentworth, a newspaper editor,
in response to Mr. Wentworth's request to know what members of the Church believed.
They were subsequently published in Church periodicals.
They are now regarded as scripture and included in the Pearl of Great Price.
THE ARTICLES OF FAITH
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS History of the Church, Vol. 4, pp. 535541
Joseph Smith |
ALL of them??
Only if you play...
You AIN'T dead!!!
I was beginning to wonder after SO many courtesy pings to you went unanswered.
How long you goona play in THIS thread?
Here is some help from a fellow MORMON to clarify what you may be alluding to:
Jesus Christ is Gods Son, spiritually and physically. He calls Him Father, He prays to Him. Santorum endorses one-time rival Romney
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.