Revolting cat!, talk about "fervant bashers," even due to lack of apostrophes it seems. But such an offensive avoids dealing with the fact that it is RCs who are incessantly advertizing and promoting Rome as the elite one and only true church, and often attacking Prot. beliefs, but then complain when strongly opposed much.
There is plenty of criticism, debate and critique within the Catholic Church, thank you too much for your heartfelt concern.
That is not what we see confessed much here, but at least you do affirm that there is plenty of criticism, debate and critique within the Catholic Church, now that the Inquisition with its carnal means has ruin its course. To hear some RCs talk you would think they do not need to engage in varying degrees of interpretation of Rome, and what is infallible, and what allows some dissent, etc.
. So why don’t you go and challenge your cousins in heresy. Like those that would rather see their child die than to give her an aspirin pill.l
Why don't RC stop using FR as a papal promotion publisher? And actually, such aberrant souls as you mention are often your cousins in heresy, as like Rome, they effectively operate out of sola ecclesia, in which the church is the supreme assuredly faithful authority, with the only interpretation that has any authority being theirs.
And they reject the need to establish truth claims upon Scriptural substantiation and do not welcome corporate examination thereby, and instead they deny that they as individuals could be wrong. And which sola singularis the pope is the epitome of, for he claims he cannot be wrong if he speaks according to a certain scope and subject-based formula, and who can depose him, or have authority without his consent?
Moreover, fundamental evangelicalism has overall historically manifested a common front for basic core truths and against such cults, as well as against the additions of Rome. And even in the latter day apostasy of the church its offspring is far more conservative than Catholics , which counts and treats as members the most liberal of them. Thus both liberals and Rome counts conservative evangelicalism as their enemy. .
I accept your points and reject your posture. Catholic Church is none of your business, just as the 7-th Day Adventist theology is none of mine, but like the theology of Jim Jones and others I mentioned is closer to yours, and you and your brethren ought to debate it, and all those other 35,000 sectrs, in my opinion. It is all internal matter of you opponents of Rome, and your arguments with those Harold Campings, who are heroes on television and inside various tents and stadiums until their first big scandal. Then you deny they’re yours.
The Catholic Church, which I don’t promote, despite your insinuation, doesn’t need me, and doesn’t need you.
Fleas biting at a giant.
Finally, about the Communists, who for a century and a half have defined themselves by those they hated, the church (small ‘c’) of capitalism and imperialism, using as their bible Marx’s Das Capital as the holy scripture, with its historical myths, and yes, its prophesies of imminent doomsday and judgment day.