“limitations you have to accept when you choose to join the Roman church.”
Your argument assumes that:
someone hasn’t considered the other position and rejected it because the Catholic position is superior. That’s why your argument is terrible.
It appears that YUOU are assumin' that HE is assuming.
Not that it matters.
You have implied with this statement that you HAVE studies the other side's point of view and found it inferior.
Would I be correct in assuming that?
No. My argument states accurately that you must support whatever your magisterium comes up with to stay in good standing.
Therefore, to remain roman, you are wasting your time to actually examine the meaning of the text, because if you realize there is a better explanation of meaning, you still must believe what you were taught. You can repeat what you are taught and no more. Once the magisterium speaks you obey... unless it it like birth control and abortion, where many roman catholics in practice ignore what it taught.