Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86

“I actually don’t understand why the diocesan tribunal even deals with the SSPX-married couple if the marriage sacrament was without validity in the Church.”

To receive a writ (whatever the proper term is) saying exactly that. That way the person can marry again WITHIN the Church and with perfect validity.

“They wouldn’t deal with a civilly-married couple, would they (I have no knowledge or experience with this — correct me if wrong).”

Yes, to receive essentially the same sort of writ. I know someone who did so. He wanted to be able to marry within the Church and wanted it to be clearly understood that he never had a valid marriage previously.

The SSPX has gone so far as to pretend it has authority it clearly does not: http://www.sspxseminary.org/publications/rectors-letters-separator/rectors-letter/226.html


13 posted on 08/01/2013 3:20:25 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
To receive a writ (whatever the proper term is)

Looks like that would be "Declaration of Nullity".

I am still a little puzzled because I was told that the Church considers every marriage to be valid a priori, whether a Catholic Sacrament of Matrimony was involved or not. An annulment is obtained only if some defect is found in the previous marriage, even a civil marriage, such as one party having been coerced. Or maybe this is the old pre-Vatican II world and now anything goes as a reason?

14 posted on 08/01/2013 3:32:44 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by Nature, not Nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson