Skip to comments.
Pope Francis and Gays: “Loving the Sinner” Is Still Intolerance (Thanks for clarifying that, Time)
Time ^
| July 30, 2013
| Tim Padgett
Posted on 07/30/2013 11:25:09 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Thanks for clarifying that, Time Magazine.
I mean, the article is full of errors, but it makes its main point: the Catholic Church teaches that homosexual sex is an "intrinsic moral evil," and is opposed to it, under any conditions, for anybody.
Now and forever, Amen.
To: Mrs. Don-o
Gay marriage has been primarily about forcing people to APPROVE of homosexual acts, and secondarily about healthcare benefits.
2
posted on
07/30/2013 11:27:54 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Tipline for Zimmerman's Inquisition is: Sanford.florida@usdoj.gov ... Use it.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
given our awareness today that homosexuality is as biological as heterosexuality, I didn't get that memo.
3
posted on
07/30/2013 11:29:19 AM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Time-Lies-Warner-Turner Media has insisted God has been dead since the 1960s. Pretty intolerant of them.
To: a fool in paradise
5
posted on
07/30/2013 11:30:35 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Tipline for Zimmerman's Inquisition is: Sanford.florida@usdoj.gov ... Use it.)
To: a fool in paradise
Funny, but G-d is fine. TIME is dead.
6
posted on
07/30/2013 11:30:57 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Tipline for Zimmerman's Inquisition is: Sanford.florida@usdoj.gov ... Use it.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
can we take any religious leader seriously when he claims to love gay people but at the same time demonizes the consummation of their love for each other?
There's a bit of a biological, social and spiritual difference between, "I love you, let's do something ordered towards making a baby" and "I love you, let's do something ordered toward [. . .]"
7
posted on
07/30/2013 11:31:53 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
RE: : Loving the Sinner Is Still Intolerance
Well, at least TIME is open about their agenda -— JUST ACCEPT THE SIN and CELEBRATE IT.
But then, if you accept the sin, what the heck is there to tolerate?
You only tolerate something you disagree with...
Which in essence means the word “tolerate” has lost its meaning.
To: oldbrowser
I happen to think that homosexuality is 80% physiological, but so what? Just because a tendency may originate in biology doesn't mean it is moral to act out that tendency. I think orthodox Christians may have differing opinions about why people are homosexual; what said Christians should agree on is that sex is for marriage and that marriage means a man and a woman.
P.S. Not disagreeing with you — just neutralizing the Time writer's argument.
9
posted on
07/30/2013 11:33:35 AM PDT
by
utahagen
To: Uncle Miltie
THIS COVER CAME AFTER THAT COVER...
To: Mrs. Don-o
Suck a joke of an article from a naive closet homo.
“given our awareness today that homosexuality is as biological as heterosexuality, and that homosexual relationships have proven as valid and socially enriching as straight ones”
As biological, even though it has been proven to not be genetic, and is a biological dead end?
As valid, even though it serves zero purpose?
As socially enriching, even though it has correlation with several mental disorders, ends one’s genetic line, increases the chances of contracting potentially lethal diseases, and is pretty much rejected by over 85% of the world as disgusting?
Yeah, great article, doofus.
To: Mrs. Don-o
“How, for example, can the Catholic church declare homosexuals disordered and their lifestyle an intrinsic moral evil, yet expect us to applaud its love for gays somewhere beneath all that homophobic bigotry? “
It’s a Christian, thing, Time - you wouldn’t understand.
12
posted on
07/30/2013 11:35:44 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Uncle Miltie
I think at the time of publication, the general idea may have been that the Beatles replaced him (”Eighty million screaming teen girls can’t be wrong”). In under five years, they disbanded, at the hands of Yoko Ono? Is she God? Or maybe she’s the devil. By her fruits you shall know her.
13
posted on
07/30/2013 11:36:12 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
At the end of their days, a lot of people are going to be shocked to learn there is a God, He does have standards and His Son offered each of us an amazing salvation for the willing.
14
posted on
07/30/2013 11:37:10 AM PDT
by
keats5
(Not all of us are hypnotized.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Breaking: the Pope is Catholic.
News at 11
15
posted on
07/30/2013 11:38:00 AM PDT
by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
To: oldbrowser
I stopped reading there ... then read again to the end of the paragraph .. and stopped .....period.
I have a pretty good imagination and honest ... at a great risk (by this confession here in FR), I confess I've attempted to imagine me with another man .. and by GOD ... that's some sick stuff.
The Bible condemns men with men .. AND women with women .. in more places than one, both Old and New Testament
It ain't supposed to be ... period.
16
posted on
07/30/2013 11:38:14 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: MrB
The devils trying to degenerate the planet will be quite surprised when they find out that God is intolerant ... maybe that’s what fuels their anarchy and treachery!
17
posted on
07/30/2013 11:38:15 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: MHGinTN
Can’t wait to leave it to them for about 7 years...
18
posted on
07/30/2013 11:39:29 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Loving the sinner is tolerance, what it isn’t is acceptance.
19
posted on
07/30/2013 11:39:40 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Viennacon
As socially enriching, even though it has correlation with several mental disorders, ends ones genetic line, increases the chances of contracting potentially lethal diseases,
Oh yeah? Well, that's just because of "homophobia".
Oddly enough, miscegenation, which was in some ways more harshly looked down upon in some quarters, never caused any of those problems, regardless of social antipathy against it.
20
posted on
07/30/2013 11:39:55 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson