Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: A.A. Cunningham

It is you who is missing the truth of the Scriptures. Peter, was in fact married and the Bible doesn’t give us much more than what I referenced. Jesus didn’t commend Peter for leaving his wife - he was merely saying that we should put Him first.

And, you are wrong - the Scripture DOES teach us that Peter WAS married. I gave you the book and verses. Maybe the Catholic Bible took this out, but it certainly is in there. Matthew 8:14&15 clearly tells us that Peter’s mother-in-law was sick. One can’t have a mother-in-law unless one is married. Smoking gun? Not really - all non Catholics are aware of this. Perhaps you should read the Bible for yourself and not be spoon fed by anyone.


55 posted on 07/20/2013 8:38:29 PM PDT by Catsrus (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Catsrus

Just because Peter had a mother in law does not mean his wife was still living.


59 posted on 07/20/2013 8:43:35 PM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Catsrus
Scripture tells us that Peter was married at one time. Scripture does not mention his wife.

One can’t have a mother-in-law unless one is married.

Again, Scripture only tells us that Peter was married at one time. If my wife dies and her mother does not, I will still have a mother-in-law. It's a very simply exercise in logic.

Your knowledge of the topic at hand is quite deficient but go ahead and be content in your ignorance.

63 posted on 07/20/2013 8:55:16 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Electorate data confirms Resolute Conservative voted for Soetoro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson