Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: metmom

Someone already mentioned Revelation 5:8.


601 posted on 07/15/2013 1:59:18 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: metmom
It’s in Catholics demanding specific Catholic approved wording in Scripture to support a doctrine which non-Catholics adhere to and yet not applying the same standard to themselves but rather expecting others to take their say so as enough support.

This makes no sense to me... that's why a specific example would be helpful to me.

602 posted on 07/15/2013 2:01:53 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Elsie, Luke 9 tells us that Jesus initiated the communication. As for the terminology “pray”, the proper definition means to address a request.


603 posted on 07/15/2013 2:04:47 PM PDT by NYer ( "Run from places of sin as from the plague."--St John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; Albion Wilde
I guess it’s a bad thing then that Luther’s abridged bible tossed out books, eh?

No, it's a bad thing when people keep repeating untruths even when they have been corrected MULTIPLE times. Luther's German translation of the Bible left out NONE of the books Catholics insist are Scripture. Do you need that link again?

604 posted on 07/15/2013 2:17:49 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; metmom

Maybe I just lack curiosity about other posters backgrounds.

But then again FR is a discussion forum. not a dating service.


605 posted on 07/15/2013 2:19:09 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Lol!


606 posted on 07/15/2013 2:19:10 PM PDT by NYer ( "Run from places of sin as from the plague."--St John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; NYer; ctdonath2; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; smvoice; ...
Only God is holy. Although we are made holy by God, it is imputed to us. Even the angels do not presume to be holy.

So the question is should we be praying to anyone (or anything) that is not truly holy?

(BTW-Great post) ;O)

607 posted on 07/15/2013 2:32:29 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: newberger

The nonsense is relying on the Greek translation.

The context if the chapter was the provision of Deacons serving the synogogue. Deacons do not serve the entire body of believers, they served the synogogue.


608 posted on 07/15/2013 2:41:53 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Gotta love that pagan twisting and turning!

Contacting the dead is necromancy.


609 posted on 07/15/2013 2:44:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Well, at least we are honest about what church we belong to, making it easy to make the argument,

“Hey guyz you must support child abuse” which protestants have actually already said. Apparently we’ve never heard that old canard again.

Protestants seem to believe that it’s more honest TO NEVER REVEAL what church they actually belong to. Why, I don’t know.

So, balls in your court. :) Or are all of you in one person ‘unique flower churches’?


610 posted on 07/15/2013 2:48:09 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

“Our church is the Kingdom of God”

Which somehow includes all of you but magically excludes Catholics like a forcefield that says ‘not christian’.

Some would call it theology. Some would call it prejudice.


611 posted on 07/15/2013 2:50:06 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt; Elsie

>> “I’m curious if they would claim all of the popes are in heaven?” <<

.
I am abundantly confident that NONE of them are.

I’m sure that there are individual believers from thye RC church that will finf Yehova’s rest, but it is impossible that one of the nicolaitans would.


612 posted on 07/15/2013 2:51:17 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

That’s your standard, not mine.

Where’s the justification for your beliefs that X is bad?

Where’s the statements from Church fathers that X is bad?

Oh, that’s right, your fathers believe that Catholics are the whore of Babylon which automatically makes everything we do wrong. We’re supposed to magically believe that if the Bible says nothing about it that the Catholic church is automatically wrong. Odd that, eh?


613 posted on 07/15/2013 2:56:38 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Well, at least we are honest about what church we belong to, making it easy to make the argument,

“Hey guyz you must support child abuse” which protestants have actually already said. Apparently we’ve never heard that old canard again.

Protestants seem to believe that it’s more honest TO NEVER REVEAL what church they actually belong to. Why, I don’t know.

So, balls in your court. :)

What specific parish do you attend? What times, on what days, do you attend? What pew do you sit in, when you attend? When did you last make confession?

614 posted on 07/15/2013 2:57:28 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("...Someone handed the keys to the Forum to the OPC and its sympathizers...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“I am abundantly confident that NONE of them are.”

Apparently St. Peter doesn’t meet your high standard.

Do you believe it’s possible for a Roman Catholic to believe in God?


615 posted on 07/15/2013 2:58:15 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I attend St. Ignatius’ parish in Austin, although by Territorial boundaries (as I recently moved) put me in Holy Cross.

I usually go to the 5pm service unless I’ve got things to do that day, when I go to the 11.30 service.

You can find me about pew 6 or 7 in the middle, or in the left-most pew 6 or 7 back.

I last confessed the 30th of June.

Ok - now you’re up!


616 posted on 07/15/2013 3:01:04 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Peter never had anything to do with the papacy, it was created centuries after he died.


617 posted on 07/15/2013 3:02:13 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: metmom

‘FWIW, I don’t belong to a “church”,’

Quel surprise.


618 posted on 07/15/2013 3:02:21 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Who was the first pope then?


619 posted on 07/15/2013 3:03:17 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

“God has always had a faithful witness outside of Rome”

And your church is just magically connected with whomever was ‘not Rome’ at any particular time?

That’s awfully, ‘convenient’ I must say.

15 hundred years and you claim succession from whomever was ‘not Rome’.

You know what that smells like to me? Prejudice. A mystical barrier that separates ‘Catholic’ from ‘Christian’.


620 posted on 07/15/2013 3:06:22 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson