Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: driftdiver

I’m confused by someone who rejects ‘official episcopal oversight’ declaring other folks to be heretics.


181 posted on 07/14/2013 4:58:38 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
>>I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?"<<

Ecclesiastes 9:5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. 6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.

182 posted on 07/14/2013 4:58:52 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

“So how do explain away Marcion?”


The heretic Marcion!? How do you explain away Ignatius who was devoured by lions, who confessed that Jesus is God, the eternal perseverance of the Saints, and many other essential non-heretical doctrines? How about Polycarp, who was burned alive for his faith and wrote to the churches about the scripture they had in their possession? How do you explain away Irenaeus, who spoke of the 4 Gospels and quoted from almost every book in the New Testament?


183 posted on 07/14/2013 5:00:02 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
"Ok - again. Why would he claim that his canon was the ‘official canon’ if there existed an Apostolic canon?"

For the same reason he rejected lots of orthodoxy. He also rejected the Gospel as well as the Apostles creed as we understand it, are you saying there was no generally accepted Gospel or Apostles creed at the time since Marcion rejected them? The Gnostics rejected the Gospel at that time too, so there must not have been any generally accepted orthodoxy of the Gospel back then since the Gnostics didn't accept it.

184 posted on 07/14/2013 5:00:08 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“Ah, now that you are pinned down you change your story. You said “the Vulgate published in 400 AD by Pope Damasus was the first canon with all the books.” Athanasius catalogued the current canon, with all the books, well before that.”

I said collate, but that’s a different word, so your attempt to say that I lied, is wrong.

Yes, Athanasius did provide the list, and his list was the one cited by Pope Damasus. However, he didn’t publish a bible that reflected this canon, which is what my question asked. The Vulgate is very important to Protestants and absolutely fundamental to their position of sola scriptura.


185 posted on 07/14/2013 5:00:21 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Cousin Eddie

Luke and John written shortly after 70 A.D.

Matthew and Mark written shortly before 70 A. D. I’ve read as early as 50 A.D.


186 posted on 07/14/2013 5:00:58 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
"Sorta like that Martin Luther fella, except Marcion didn’t have the chutzpah tear books he hated out."

Which books did Luther "tear out"? He considered James an "epistle of straw" but he still included it at the end of his translation. As well as all the other books.

187 posted on 07/14/2013 5:03:20 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

“How do you explain away Ignatius”

So, please give me the canon according to Ignatius.

“How do you explain away Irenaeus, who spoke of the 4 Gospels and quoted from *almost* every book in the New Testament?”

You’ve got me there! *almost*!= All. Thanks for confirming my point.


188 posted on 07/14/2013 5:03:50 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Christians don’t believe we have to rely on a man to interpret the Bible, or to understand Gods will.

____________________________

Was that what Jesus told Nicodemus? What did Philip (deacon) say to the Eunuch?


189 posted on 07/14/2013 5:03:51 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

No. I told you that contraception was effective and that it was one of the reasons that I felt Western society was collapsing. You, on the other hand, insisted that condoms do not work.


190 posted on 07/14/2013 5:04:57 PM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Thank you, I was just posted that from the original article.


191 posted on 07/14/2013 5:05:03 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

I dont know, why don’t you tell me.


192 posted on 07/14/2013 5:06:18 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“Which books did Luther “tear out”? He considered James an “epistle of straw” but he still included it at the end of his translation. As well as all the other books.”

Parts of Daniel (not sure how you tear out part of a book and maintain sola scriptura).

Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, 1+2 Maccabees, Baruch, 3+4 Ezra.


193 posted on 07/14/2013 5:07:15 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

So I take it that you would not be charmed by the relic of a saint’s tongue - as I saw once in an Italian church? O ye, of little faith and large squeamishness.


194 posted on 07/14/2013 5:07:17 PM PDT by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; driftdiver
The catechism of the Catholic church states that Catholics do not pray to saints. Sorry to disappoint you.

Then why do they?

195 posted on 07/14/2013 5:07:33 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
"Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, 1+2 Maccabees, Baruch, 3+4 Ezra."

Jerome didn't want to include those either. Cuz they are not scripture.

196 posted on 07/14/2013 5:08:20 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
>>“Pray for one another” - Jesus.<<

So now you want to listen to Jesus? Jesus said to pray to the Father, not to those who “neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.”

197 posted on 07/14/2013 5:09:14 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

“You’ve got me there! *almost*!= All. Thanks for confirming my point.”


And what, exactly, is your point? That we needed the Roman Catholic church to confirm that Jude is scripture, because Irenaeus never had a purpose for quoting it? Or, perhaps, that the epistle to the Hebrews is scripture, since Rome denied that it was scripture in the 4th century, contrary to Jerome’s observation that it was anciently employed within the Christian church?

I will have to stick with Jerome and the early Christian writers over you. Sorry.


198 posted on 07/14/2013 5:10:13 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Cousin Eddie

“There was no New Testament (i.e. no Christian Bible) when the Apostles and the earliest Christians walked the earth. The Gospels were written sometime between 60 A.D. and 100 A.D. Therefore the earliest Chistians couldn’t have been practicing according to the precise dictates of the Gospels, letters of Paul, etc. Were they practicing incorrectly also?”

Of course not. The apostles were alive and teaching and writing and their epistles and Gospels were circulating. Even their errors were being corrected - just read Corinthians...

“Catholics believe that souls of the faithfully departed reside in heaven. We don’t worship saints or Mary, but we ask those souls to join us in prayer. The fact that it isn’t mentioned in the Bible is a doesn’t make it invalid.”

Total crapshoot. See #8 on this thread.


199 posted on 07/14/2013 5:11:08 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

It’s in the Bible.

;-)


200 posted on 07/14/2013 5:11:19 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson