So, we’re supposed to take the unsupported word of a politician being interviewed by an unknown presstitute about something that happened about forty years ago?
Sounds like more anti-Catholic bigotry to me.
A trend I've observed from both Catholics and Protestants here is that either side will post NY-Slimes, abc, or cbs pieces with impunity that support their side of the discussion, but when the other side does the same the reaction is "just another anti-Baptist/Catholic/Calvinist/Orthodox hit-piece!"
The media is out against ALL of us, which is why I take any article from such sources with a huge grain of salt.
Really??? Of everything in the news today you post this?? You choose to take a swipe at fellow Christians instead? Okie doke then....kinda speaks volumes.
(Imagine that)
But,.... but.... but.... it CAN'T be!!!
We've been assured over and over by FRoman Catholics that the problem is well in hand and "something" is being done about it.
Looks like you hit a nerve.
Catholics just can’t stand the facts about their church being exposed.
If you had posted something that made the RCC look good, it would have been true enough to be written in stone.
Something that makes it look bad, and it’s *hate* and *anti-Catholic bigotry*.
Image is everything.
“Interferred”? Is that an Australian thing?