Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Notre Dame Professor Tackles ‘Myth’ of Christian Martyrdom
Yahoo News ^ | 5/3/13 | Liz Goodwin

Posted on 05/03/2013 10:50:36 AM PDT by marshmallow

Candida Moss, a professor of early Christianity at the University of Notre Dame and a practicing Catholic, wants to shatter what she calls the “myth” of martyrdom in the Christian faith.

Sunday school tales of early Christians being rounded up at their secret catacomb meetings and thrown to the lions by evil Romans are mere fairy tales, Moss writes in a new book. In fact, in the first 250 years of Christianity, Romans mostly regarded the religion's practitioners as meddlesome members of a superstitious cult.

The government actively persecuted Christians for only about 10 years, Moss suggests, and even then intermittently. And, she says, many of the best known early stories of brave Christian martyrs were entirely fabricated.

The controversial thesis, laid out in "The Myth of Persecution: How Early Christians Invented a Story of Martyrdom," has earned her a lot of hate mail and a few sidelong looks from fellow faculty members. But Moss maintains that the Roman Catholic Church and historians have known for centuries that most early Christian martyr stories were exaggerated or invented.

A small group of priest scholars in the 17th century began sifting through the myths, discrediting not only embellished stories about saints (including that St. George slew a dragon) but also tossing out popular stories about early Christian martyrs.

Historians, including Moss, say only a handful of martyrdom stories from the first 300 years of Christianity—which includes the reign of the cruel, Christian-loathing Nero—are verifiable. (Saint Perpetua of Carthage, pictured in the stained glass window above, is one of the six famous early Christian martyrs Moss believes was actually killed for her faith.)

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; History
KEYWORDS: catholic; notredame; notreshame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-153 next last
To: Just mythoughts

“Flesh woman?” is there any other kind? And if you are applying this to the mother of Jesus, it is a contemptible thing to say. Further, Jesus himself was born of a woman, which means he was fleshy as well.


81 posted on 05/03/2013 1:04:44 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Actually Edward Gibbon did the debunking 200 years ago. He gave credence to about 2000 martyrs.(Based upon memory)


82 posted on 05/03/2013 1:12:36 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: Houghton M.

[[All that is accurate history]]

Sources?


84 posted on 05/03/2013 1:32:43 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

[[Right. I’m arguing that a chick prof just magically came up with a list of six, and only six martyrs that passed her mystical ‘sniff test’,]]

Precisely, and fro mthere she apaprently extrapolates all the way out to and insinuation of ‘So therefore most other stories could not be true as well’.


85 posted on 05/03/2013 1:38:03 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"Just because Christians were prosecuted or executed, even unjustly, does not mean that they were persecuted."

Clever sophistry. She's playing word games.

Every serious historian admits that persecution of Christians wasn't constant, that it flared up at some moments and then died down. There's nothing new in that.

It looks like Candida is denying the reality of persecution to score points in today's political debates and to make a name for herself.

86 posted on 05/03/2013 1:55:28 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh; All

The book really isn’t about history, which Ms. Moss mangles, but is rather aimed at current political battles which can clearly be seen in the promo video at the beginning of this post.

From the comments: “Her argument is so utterly weird — especially in that she is apparently arguing that if Christians were being persecuted for something they did as Christians (like, say, not sacrificing to the emperor) that this somehow didn’t count as persecution so long as the Roman’s weren’t going after them specifically for believing in Christ. “

Precisely- in a nutshell- her main argument is that while Christyians wetre put to death for not bowing and sdacrificing to the Empereror, that because the ‘government’ didn’t pursue htem specifically because they were Christians and hunt htem down for bweing Christians, that this ‘doesn’t count’ as persectution of Christians

Not sure why “Christians’ are defendign htis chick with an agenda- seems they woudl be appalled at her obvious attack on CHristianity, and be appalled at her warped reasoning and make hte effort to defend Christianty insterasd of rushign to her defense- but whatever- Many peopel call themselves Christiansdc b ut ALWAYS seem to side with, and defend Anti-Christian ideology and seem to relish any attackso nthe faith that come along- Seems ot me the lvoe of God really isn’t present in their lives

Perhaps she woudl also make the claim that because Gvoenrments all over hte world aren’t wpecifically citing the person’s faith right before they put the Christian to death, that current day persecuition and Martyredome isn’t takign palce today too- (Yet anyoen with an iota of common sense can correctly conclude that Christians ARE ifnacft beign targetted and murderecd and Martyred for hteir faith REGARDLESS of whether the systematic murderer declares it or not


87 posted on 05/03/2013 1:59:20 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
Not sure why “Christians’ are defendign htis chick with an agenda- seems they woudl be appalled at her obvious attack on CHristianity, and be appalled at her warped reasoning and make hte effort to defend Christianty insterasd of rushign to her defense- but whatever- Many peopel call themselves Christiansdc b ut ALWAYS seem to side with, and defend Anti-Christian ideology and seem to relish any attackso nthe faith that come along- Seems ot me the lvoe of God really isn’t present in their lives

It has to do with internal conflicts between various factions: mainstream vs. evangelical, liberal vs. traditionalist.

88 posted on 05/03/2013 2:02:15 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

[[The moron professor probably thinks that the Sudan is a perfectly safe for a openly practicing christian to live...]]

Yes, becausei n herm ind, even if that person is put to death, the govenrment won’t have actually ‘targetted the person simpyl because they are Christians’ (even though EVERYONE but liberals understand that the persons ARE targetted because they are Christians)- Apparently the Executioner has to declare “Because you are a Christian, I am gouign to murder you’ before she will find it a ‘ligitimate case’ or persecution and martyredom


89 posted on 05/03/2013 2:07:00 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
As I’ve pointed out in other posts, this has been dangerous to Christians throughout the centuries, was dangerous to Israelites for centuries before Christ, and is still dangerous today.

It’s the hissing of the serpent in Eden - “Did God REALLY say you can’t provide money for other people to commit child sacrifice to Molech? NO, He’s just a party-pooper trying to keep you captive to Him. He really knows that you won’t die if you eat from that tree. Instead you’ll be liberated and free and won’t need Him any more... You’ll by your own goddess, deciding for yourself what is right and wrong...”

Very well said.

90 posted on 05/03/2013 2:38:14 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Candida Moss, a professor of early Christianity at the University of Notre Dame and a practicing Catholic, wants to shatter what she calls the “myth” of martyrdom in the Christian faith.

Moss is a practicing turd.

91 posted on 05/03/2013 2:56:16 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS; Hacksaw
Chabad gets heck from the lax and the observant, doesn’t it?

As I said, Chabad as its problems. First there are the Meshichists who claim the late Lubavitcher Rebbe (zt"l) is Mashiach HaMelekh. But that's nothing. The real heresy that exists within Chabad is 'Eloqut, the belief that the late Rebbe was (G-d forbid!) "G-d in a human body." I don't think there are many of these people (there are certainly fewer than there are Meshichists, and they are a minority themselves). But their presence is troubling.

Today's Chabad has critics among the Sages and great Rabbis but the Rebbe had admirers among them as well.

As for our friend Hacksaw, well . . . having taken a look at his recent posting history I can only say that he isn't arguing from a "kosher" perspective. He is in fact an unfortunate example of a type of poster who once infested FR but have been largely kicked off over the years. That he has been here longer than I have is troubling.

92 posted on 05/03/2013 3:09:51 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

“Flesh woman?” is there any other kind? And if you are applying this to the mother of Jesus, it is a contemptible thing to say. Further, Jesus himself was born of a woman, which means he was fleshy as well.”


Luk 11:27-28 And it came to pass, as he spake these things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast sucked. (28) But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.

I certainly wouldn’t speak ill of Mary since it’s not her fault that Rome has made a deity out of her. But the idea of Mary as being higher than other women of faith, on top of this idea that her prayers can get us out of purgatory, or that kneeling in front of her statue gives us access to some kind of magical “grace” with which to better our chances of getting into heaven, or that she is a mediator between man and the One True Mediator is pure superstition and idolatry.


93 posted on 05/03/2013 3:28:44 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
“Flesh woman?” is there any other kind? And if you are applying this to the mother of Jesus, it is a contemptible thing to say. Further, Jesus himself was born of a woman, which means he was fleshy as well.

IT does not matter what you or I find 'contemptible', it is what the Heavenly Father finds 'contemptible'. Mary was not His wife. In what Rome calls allegory, it is Written that the Heavenly Father divorced Israel for her idolatry/adultery... as she Israel went whoring after her neighbors 'gods'. And Israel's sister Judah did no better. Jeremiah 3:8

Paul who penned most of the so called New Testament wrote ICorinthians 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.

And the new pope claims he has dibs on Jesus, that only through him can Jesus be found. OH the folly.

94 posted on 05/03/2013 5:29:58 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: illinidiva; Houghton M.
I think you're right. One can apply fairly universally accepted criteria for historiography, and sort out the historic from the legendary.

Neither credulity nor a "hermeneutic of suspicion" serves the truth. One just has to do the standard literary detective work. Hard work --- and it doesn't necessarily produce unanimous agreement --- but it's worth the effort.

95 posted on 05/03/2013 5:56:29 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("In Christ we form one body, and each member belongs to all the others." Romans 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: illinidiva
The Primacy of Peter and the Primacy of Love: 3rd Sunday of Easter
11 Reasons the Authority of Christianity Is Centered on St. Peter and Rome
The Primacy of Peter
On St. Peter's Imprisonment and Miraculous Release

The Twelve Apostles of the Catholic Church: St. Peter [Catholic Caucus]
Church Authority Doesn't "Peter" Out
Radio Replies Second Volume - St. Peter in Rome
Did Peter Have a Successor?
St. Peter and the Primacy of Rome
SAINT PETER'S CHAINS (44 A.D.)
Heart of the Church (St. Peter in Words and Stone)
A Saint for the Rest of Us
On This Rock
WAS ST. PETER IN ROME?

St. Peter and Rome
Did the Apostle Peter Ever Visit Rome?
Occasionally Naive and Fearful, Yet Honest and Capable of Repentance (Profile of St. Peter)
Saint Peter As Seen by His Successor (extraordinary document from B16 on his preaching and papacy)
HOMILIES PREACHED BY FATHER ALTIER ON THE FEAST OF SAINTS PETER AND PAUL
Peter, Witness of the Resurrection (Papal preparations for Easter 2006)
The Fraternal Society of St. Peter on EWTN
The Primacy of Peter
Saint Peter and the Vatican, the Legacy of the Popes
Saint Peter and The Vatican - Legacy of the Popes

96 posted on 05/03/2013 6:09:24 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: illinidiva
On St. Paul the Apostles Experience of Contemplative Prayer
Paul's Strange Mention of Co-Senders: What It Might Mean
Jesus and His Church Are One[St. Paul's Experience]

Another Paul - Discovery of 6th Century Image of the Apostle in Catacombs of St. Gennaro in Naples
Send us your favorite St. Paul quote [Ecumenical]
Paul and the Eucharist
Vatican used nighttime mission to gather relics from St. Paul's tomb
The Early Christians of Philippi
Benedict says bones may belong to St Paul
New Discoveries. Why St. Paul Was Given a Philosopher's Face
Basilica bones are St Paul's, Pope declares after carbon dating tests
Oldest Icon of St. Paul Discovered
Pope: St. Paul's Remains Found in Basilica
Rome Catacomb Reveals "Oldest" Image of St Paul

Rome Catacomb Reveals "Oldest" Image Of St Paul
Pope: Scientific analysis done on St. Paul's bones
Oldest Icon of St. Paul Discovered
On St. Paul and Justification
On St. Paul and the Second Coming
On St. Paul and the Resurrection
On St. Paul and the Cross
On Paul's Christology
On How St. Paul Knew Christ
St. Paul's Teaching on the Church

On Paul's Dealings With Peter
On Paul and the Other Apostles
On Paul, an Apostle of Christ
St. Paul's Faith Based Not on Conversion of Thought, but Personal Meeting With Christ, Pope Says
Paul's Conversion
[St.] Paul's Biography
On Paul's World and Time Period
Pope Benedict said to plan examination of St. Paul
The Conversion of St. Paul
Remains of St. Paul may have been found

Paul's Teaching on the Church
Vatican archaeologists unearth St. Paul's tomb
Paul's Teaching on the Holy Spirit
Paul of Tarsus, Continued: He Lives From Christ and With Christ
Paul of Tarsus: Be Imitators of Me, As I Am of Christ
HOMILIES PREACHED BY FATHER ALTIER ON THE FEAST OF SAINTS PETER AND PAUL
St. Paul's Vision
Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul -- January 25
Original Sin According to Saint Paul
St. Paul the Eccentric

97 posted on 05/03/2013 6:10:07 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
"Now my catholic in-laws tell me that the ‘old’ testament is mere allegory... per church doctrine."

Your 'catholic' in-laws must be either members of some quasi-catholic kook cult, or, excuse me, quite ignorant.

98 posted on 05/03/2013 6:16:48 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (" If they refuse to listen even to the Church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
what she calls the “myth” of martyrdom in the Christian faith.

Does she say anything about the recently crucified Christians in Egypt?

/johnny

99 posted on 05/03/2013 7:13:13 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Your 'catholic' in-laws must be either members of some quasi-catholic kook cult, or, excuse me, quite ignorant.

My 'catholic' in-laws are quite devoted to their church. IF they are quasi-catholic kook cult, or, you are excused, quite ignorant, then the problem is viral not theirs alone.

100 posted on 05/03/2013 8:27:36 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson