[Mrs. Don-o]

SSM is an act against the natural, inbuilt purposes of sex and marriage --- but what the heck? Millions of heterosexuals don't feel obliged to act in accordance with the "natural" "inbuilt" purposes of sex and marriage.

The homosexuals aren't making their stunning social and political inroads by themselves. How could they? They only represent 2 - 3% of the population. They're making these inroads because they have huge numbers of heterosexual allies who agree with the LGBT premise: namely, that wedding and bedding aren't primarily about sacred procreative sexuality, but about adult satisfaction.

Let's face it: if marriage is about celebrating a relationship of mutual satisfaction and love between adults, there's no reason why it would have to be a man and a woman.

[ReformationFan]

“Let’s face it: if marriage is about celebrating a relationship of mutual satisfaction and love between adults, there’s no reason why it would have to be a man and a woman.”

Or just one man to just one woman.

[TArcher]

>>there’s no reason why it would have to be a man and a woman.

Reproductive social competition and biological / historical fact indicate otherwise.