Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

>>there’s no reason why it would have to be a man and a woman.

Reproductive social competition and biological / historical fact indicate otherwise.


20 posted on 04/22/2013 6:26:19 PM PDT by TArcher ("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men" -- Does that still work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TArcher
Well, you missed my whole point my omitting the first half of my sentence:

"Let's face it: IF marriage is about celebrating a relationship of mutual satisfaction and love between adults, there's no reason why it would have to be a man and a woman."

The corollary is that marriage is not just about "celebrating a relationship". It's about creating a family via procreation.

21 posted on 04/23/2013 5:00:00 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Save us from the fires of hell; lead all souls to heaven, especially those in most need of Thy mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson