Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Diego1618

“To support the idea of a three in one Godhead you must use terms not found in the Bible; You must rely on false scripture....”


This has been firmly refuted in my first post, clearly showing the existence of the Trinity within the scriptures. Whether one uses the word “Trinity” or not, doesn’t stop you from some basic reasoning. Now you say “false scripture,” are you saying those scriptures are wrong?

More importantly, if you are a member of his religious cult, and therefore you think that you are a Christian and we are not (you received the Holy Spirit from the laying on of hands from the UCG, which none of us have done), can you please defend your theology? I defined your positions (presumably, if you are not UCG, you’ll have to tell me what you are and I’ll get the appropriate documentation out...), can you please defend Polytheism in the Bible?

I look forward to your responses.


75 posted on 04/15/2013 8:16:01 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans; Diego1618
Without the belief in the Trinity, one can only reach a number of other conclusions:

1. Jesus was not God. He was some kind of lesser god or demiurge (Jehovah's Witnesses)
2. Jesus was not God. He was a man who became God (Mormons)
3. Jesus was not God. He was a man who was possessed by God (Gnostics)
4. Jesus and the Father were the same, so Jesus was not man, so His sacrifice was not real as this was a spirit on the cross, a phantom (latter part is Moslem, former part is Unitarian or Oneness Pentecostal or UCG)

113 posted on 04/15/2013 9:39:41 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
“To support the idea of a three in one Godhead you must use terms not found in the Bible; You must rely on false scripture....” (by Diego)

This has been firmly refuted in my first post

No.......... it wasn't!

143 posted on 04/16/2013 6:58:18 AM PDT by Diego1618 ( Put "Ron" on the rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson