Okay, my FRiend, your posts are beginning to sound like, "I'm rubber, you're glue, everything you say..."
If you can prove that Jesus said that Rome was going to be the location of a gigantus organzition which controlled all of the thoughts/doctrines/practices of Christians, then bring it on. Show us biblicists where those passages are. We represent our positions with biblical support...please do the same. If you can.
My posts here claim those do not exist. They certainly exist in the minds/hearts/personal documents of the RCC, but not in the Scriptures. There is an entirely different story told there. But, Rome poo-poos it like your post. Well, there you have it: The Bible vs. Poo Poo.
It is an often repeated joke among lawyers that every court case folds when it is revealed that the opposition has a "bus load of nuns" on its witness list. In spite of yours being a speciously posed question, we CAN and DO prove exactly that. We have the witness of 2,000 years of Sacred Tradition augmenting the Sacred Scripture expressed through the Magisterium of the Church. Try as you like, you will never convince Catholic jury members to the contrary.
Peace be with you.
You are under the mistaken impression that the Bible is required to prove everything, it isn't. You see the Catholic Church existed for almost 300 years before the Bible, and 1300 before the B@$T@RDIZEd KJV. We have 2000 years of Sacred Tradition and the magesterium on our side.
So when you can demonstrate to this revert Catholic that the Bible came before the Catholic Church you might have a case, but I doubt it.
“We represent our positions with biblical support...please do the same. If you can.”
Where is the biblical support that all Truth can only be found in the Bible? Surely the Bible wouldn’t fail to mention that.