“We represent our positions with biblical support...please do the same. If you can.”
Where is the biblical support that all Truth can only be found in the Bible? Surely the Bible wouldn’t fail to mention that.
You must have missed it.
It's with the part that says to throw out nearly as much Scripture from the Old Testament as there is in the New Testament.
Of course Jesus Christ and the Apostles would have made a very clear statement about it if everything anyone needed was in Scripture just like they'd have made it very clear that parts of the Septuagint were not the inspired Word of God if they shouldn't have been included in the Septuagint.
It all comes down to the fact that people prefer to follow Eve rather than Jesus Christ and rationalize their doing so by pretending to believe in the Scripture when in reality, they twist Scripture to suit what they want to believe.
Just grease up with Superslick Christian Liberty Grease and not only can you throw out part of the Bible if you don't like it, you can even condone murdering infants in the womb by saying it falls under, "Christian Liberty".
All truth is not in the Bible. For instance, how to ride a skateboard is clearly not in the Bible. But, I just saw a kid doing this, so we can assume that plenty of unrelated things are not in the Bible.
However, the topics of whether God is there, what to believe about Him, His Son & His Spirit, what the Gospel is, how to gather together, and that local "greybeards" (elder men) are responsible for each gathering not some single monstrosity in charge of all others, happen to be. Notice the passages quoted from Tim. (in prior post) and those found in Jude, Tim. and others...
"...I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend earnestly for the faith wich was once for all delivered to the believers." Evidently, all that was necessary for understanding the Gospel content had already been delivered by the time Jude was written...AND there is no Rome!
Tim. Let the elders who direct affairs of the gathering be considered worthy of double honor...AND there is no Rome!
I don't have the time (or inclination) to try and prove a negative ("Prove that Rome is not what we say it is!"). The burden of proof is on Rome to demonstrate whence cometh her authority. Then add to that burden, the burden of proving her monstrous doctrines of sacerdotalism, purgatory, indulgences, genuflecting, mariolatry, etc. Have to run, but try to read the text without the Rome-colored glasses...it will Reform you.