[svcw]

The group says it aims to help "people who voluntarily seek to change from a 'gay' lifestyle to a gender-affirming one".

I have always found it interesting that homosexuals are so afraid of this statement, if as they claim homosexuality is set, then what are they afraid of, and why would they care if someone wishes not to engage in the activity any longer.

[manc]

the homostapo even goes after those homosexuals who said they made a mistake and are now saying they are cured.

That is how afraid these feces pushers are.

As for the UK, ARF, a country being invaded by one group while accepting another agenda which is opposed to the invaders.

Nah nothing could go wrong there.

[Norm Lenhart]

Consider:

You are born with X
You BELIEVE nature made a mistake and you should have gotten Y at the shop.
You go to a Doctor/surgeon to get modified from original equipment based on pure BELIEF and WANT.

This is “Good”.

Conversely”

You are born hetrosexual. No science proves otherwise.
You BELIEVE/are propagandised/whatever into liking people with the same factory parts.

This is “Good”

But when:

You decide that the risk of AIDS/guilt/shame/a change of heart for WHATEVER REASON occurs and you decide that you really are not what you BELIEVED/WANTED AT ONE TIME...

This is racist/bigoted/homophobic/a crime against humanity because CHANGE IS WRONG.

Eventually when this all implodes on itself and the Road Warrior scenario begins, I am going to take EXTREME PLEASURE in watching these idiots turned into human cattle/slaves to the most feral libs. I really am.

[ReformationFan]

“why would they care if someone wishes not to engage in the activity any longer.”

I’ve wondered that too. After all, no one is stopping those who wish to engage in homosexual activity if they wish to continue to do so. What business is it of theirs if someone else wishes to not engage in it?

Since homosexual individuals only make up 1-3% of the population, I’m guessing they’re scared that the dating pool for them will dry up. That or their consciences are convicting them of the fact that regardless of what their feelings are, they do have a choice to abstain and control themselves from such activities.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Funny that "Some people are gay, get over it" is fine, but "Post-gay and proud, get over it" is judged "not a contribution to a reasoned debate."

What could a "reasoned debate" consist of, if one side is not allowed to express their point of view?