That is a rather odd conclusion to come to, especially since she already discussed something rather different here:
Mormon scripture states that he is merely a physical, exalted man.
She also misses this from "The Family - A Proclamation to the World":
Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.
That sort of makes her points that Mormon theology is genderless or gender-neutral a strained one.
Not that it really changes what drives her ultimate conclusion.
“That is a rather odd conclusion to come to, especially since she already discussed something rather different here:
Mormon scripture states that he is merely a physical, exalted man.”
Spirited: Yes, Mormonism speaks of an already existing man-god, but because Mormonism cannot account for the origin of life it omits any account of how and where this man-god came to be and depends on its adherents to simply accept on the face of it that he exists.
However, analysis reveals that the answer to the man-god’s existence is found within the ancient concept of eternally existing matter.
Even though Mormonism dresses itself up in Biblical language, analysis of its’ metaphysical foundations reveals that it is a variation of nature religion.
Shhssh!
Don't tell the new recruits!