[CHRISTIAN DIARIST]

Blessed are the attractive young female entertainers who “generate” buzz by using their God-given talents to the fullest, and not by dressing themselves up like harlots.

[Sacajaweau]

No Dems allowed would eliminate just about everyone.

[Chad N. Freud]

... the old saying comes to mind, closing the barn door after the whores are already leftists....

[V_TWIN]

I heard on Fox news this morning, celebs at this awards show get a “swag bag” full of gifts worth $21,000.

$21,000 for what? Preening infront of cameras and slaping each other on the back for being “entertainers?

I’m sure the IRS is all over it. /s/

[illiac]

Won’t watch.

Tired of seeing these people break their arms patting themselves on the back for something that is not worth watching or paying to watch (movies)....

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Yikes. Remember the good old days when people had common sense and the "dress code" was merely "skirt hems no more than 3 inches above the knee and no sleeveless blouses"?

Frankly, the Grammys executives shouldn't have to worry about this problem when it is clearly within the purview of the Obama administration. Instead, the government must intervene and immediately create and enforce uniform dress codes for all such events. PSAs are needed to address this crisis right now.

[cardinal4]

I’m actually a little heartened to read this article. If CBS, arguably one of the more agenda driven, leftist, media outlets is worried about modesty, for whatever reason, tells me enough folks are speaking up.
The Super Bowl, from its commercials to the halftime show was decidedly an adult theme. Mayhap a number folks complained and CBS, who did the Bowl this year, is reacting. I found the Go Daddy commercial to be very offensive, something more akin to cable than prime time TV. And I am not a prude..

[Rashputin]

The thing that gets me is all the years of hogwash in various media about women wanting men to take them seriously as something other than sex objects. All the while, role models for women stripped themselves down more and more until now they're stripped down like slaves on the auction block. Then the other day I ran across an article with a group of younger women complaining that guys their age aren’t interested in any long term relationship, even living together.

Obviously the "well educated career women" in the article don't want to admit the obvious.

When something is heavily marketed and includes extensive limitations and escape clauses in the sales contract to the point that the purchased owns the purchaser, it's not long before rentals and short term leases far outnumber outright purchases.

[Tax-chick]

It makes me sad, because these women have all the beautiful clothes in the world available to them, yet they think they will attract positive attention only if their nipples or “underside buttocks curvature” are visible.

I have three daughters whose constant outfit is jeans and nerdy t-shirts. (ThinkGeek.com is a favorite source.) Yes, it’s modest enough, but I often tell them, “Imagine how pretty you would look if you put on a skirt and a blouse ... why, that very skirt and blouse hanging in your closet!”

It seems there’s no middle ground between clothes appropriate for yardwork and clothes appropriate for prostitution: no such thing as just “looking nice” or “looking pretty.”

[Revolting cat!]

I read this alleged “advisory” as satire, yes?