Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
"In other words, it was already there. It already existed. Peter held it. Linus could only obtain it, could only be appointed bishop, after Peter was martyred for only then would the episcopate be open."

Nonsense. There is nothing at all to suggest "it was already there." It does say that Linus was the FIRST to obtain the episcopate and that event happened after the death of Peter and Paul. Nothing in the passage comes close to suggesting Peter was the first Bishop of Rome which would certainly have been pointed out if true. None of Peter's epistles say a thing about Peter being a Bishop of Rome, nor does Paul's letter to the well established Chucrch in Rome. It is a purely made up fiction.

102 posted on 01/24/2013 7:44:00 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

No, the passage itself shows Linus was the first bishop AFTER Peter’s martyrdom. He was the first to OBTAIN the EPISCOPATE. That’s an office. A specific office that already existed. And his obtaining it was only possible when Peter was martyred.


103 posted on 01/24/2013 7:52:28 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson