Posted on 12/30/2012 12:01:24 PM PST by narses
OK.
Actually, we Christians are “a nation of priests” (I Peter 2:9), fulfilling a role that had been slated for the Israelites (Exodus 19), with one high priest: Jesus. Which means we ought to be intercessors and ambassadors to the whole world, praying ‘til our knees are calloused and living like, well, Saints.
Whatever you may believe in is your choice, but I prefer to follow Jesus Christ's words Matt 25:31-46 34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
Note that
So, those who kid themselves that just by faith ALONE, they can call out "Lord, Lord", they will be saved, well.... they're going to have a shock...
Jesus 34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: 36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
No quotes out of context -- I prefer to follow Jesus Christ's teachings rather than yours, sorry.
On what authority should we believe Peter?
you see this continuation in 1 Peter 2 which references Exodus 19:6 Although the whole earth is mine, 6 you[a] will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.
The universal priesthood still had the ministerial priesthood
The word is pastors, not priests.
We are all priests, in that we deal directly with the Lord, not with an intercessionist. This is exactly what Christ denounced WRT “nicolaitans.” The Pharisees were the model for the nicolaitans, with their false oral traditions which the nicolaitans have carried foreward to this day.
If it is oral, it is of Satan.
>> “On what authority should we believe Peter?” <<
On the authority of Yeshua, who praised his understanding, and said that it came from the father.
The problem is that you don’t necessarily know that what you’re hearing came from Peter if it isn’t in the word.
Nothing in that quote you posted has any agreement with your positions, so to follow his teachings, you would have change direction.
Of course this priesthood thing is a perpetual bone of contention between Catholics and protestants. I myself am firmly in the camp of the “priesthood of all believers.” Any Christian has direct access through prayer, even silent prayer, to God and Jesus, our living high priest, through the Holy Spirit within us. There is no need for an earthly, human intercessor, let alone anyone to continue making offerings to God. The one, true sacrifice was made by Christ himself.
I think the prevailing view is that the Israelites abdicated their role as a “nation of priests” with their little foray into gold-calf making. It was after that, in his anger and disappointment, that God ordained the Aaronic priesthood, which continued until the destruction of the last temple in 70 AD and the end of ritual sacrifice. Nowhere does Jesus or any of the apostles talk of an intercessory priesthood for Christians after his death. Teachers, preachers, evangelists, yes, but not priests making sacrifices or standing in between God and his saints, absolving sin or prescribing penance.
To be a bit more cynical about it, I’m highly suspicious and generally disdainful of the Religious Professionals (RPs, I call them) who make a comfortable living feeding off the Lord’s flock. Ezekiel 34 ought to give pause to any self-anointed shepherds who go into the ministry (Catholic or Protestant) to enjoy a cushy lifestyle with no heavy lifting. The way the whole sacramental thing has evolved strikes me as something akin to trade unionism, designed to ensure full employment for the RP class. Fortunately, according to the Anglican 39 Articles, the moral corruption of clergy does not invalidate the administration of sacraments.
>> “ the moral corruption of clergy does not invalidate the administration of sacraments.” <<
.
When you break the bread, and drink the wine/juice, you’re having a symbolic meal with Yeshua, in remembrance of his broken body that heals yours, and his shed blood that paid for your sins.
It has nothing to do with any clergy, you can buy or bake the bread yourself, and do it at home, or in a motel room, and it remains the same. I would hesitate to partake of any bread offered by one who believes that he has conjured up the body of Yeshua therein. That is no better than eating the meat offered to idols.
Agreed. I was thinking mainly of baptism.
Don't stick to just English with its limitations...
As you said " The Pharisees were the model for the nicolaitans, with their false oral traditions which the nicolaitans have carried foreward to this day." and note that "The common statement is that the Nicolaitans held the antinomian heresy of Corinth." and antinomianism and the doctrine of sola fide (justification through faith alone) are historically related,
and that is orthodox teaching. The Church holds that, just as with the ancient Israelites, we are all a "nation of priests" and just as the ancient Israelites had ministerial priests set aside (Levites), so too do we have in the Church
The same structure -- with the difference that the High Priest is eternal Jesus Christ who is present at each Eucharist, each Mass
the Israelites abdicated their role as a nation of priests with their little foray into gold-calf making. -- sorry, that doesn't hold as we read in Exodus 16 how Aaron and Moses preach to the Israelites
Even in Exodus 19 with the pronouncement of you[a] will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. -- these come from God through Moses and in Exodus 19:22 you read And let the priests also, which come near to the Lord, sanctify themselves, lest the Lord break forth upon them.
This was before Moses went up into Mt. Sinai
Christ is the High Priest and we are all His priestly nation -- whether lay priests or ministerial priests
The High Priest, Jesus Christ is the High Priest and the one-time Sacrifice -- note, this is a participation in the One-Time sacrifice famously captured by Van Eyck in the 14th century painting
We are participating in Christ's one-time sacrifice which as seen in the words of the Apocalypse of St. John of Patmos, as seen in Heaven is the Lamb standing proudly with the blood of Christ in the Eucharist
NOTE: the English term "priest" is simply a contraction of the Greek word presbuteros (presbyster/elder) -- these have the responsibility of teaching, governing, and providing the sacraments in a given congregation (1 Tim. 5:17; Jas. 5:1415).
correct. That is because these are in the end just the ministers performing their duty, while the real grace comes from the High Priest
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.