BlueDragon:
Well, again, 3 reputable Church Historians, all conclude that Peter died in Rome, Professors Chadwick, Prof. Pelikan and Prof Scaff. You continue to say that Scripture never states that Peter died in Rome. For the record, it did not say he did not die in Rome either.
So what we have is a constant tradition of the Church Fathers indicating that both Peter and Paul died in Rome and an Anglican Church History Professor [Chadwick], a German-Swiss Reformed Church History Professor in Scaff and a Lutheran [entered into the Eastern Orthdodox Church late in his life] in J. Pelikan.
So is it your contention that those 3 are all wrong and your conclusion about Peter is correct. And the links from CCL are there for you to read, I did not cherry pick anything. Scaffs footnotes cleary state that Peter and Paul were both killed in Rome. He is a German-Swiss Reformed CHurch History Scholar, perhaps the best known of the 19th century.
YOU'VE GOT THE WRONG GUY
I told you that already. You are mixing up conversations here. Direct those comments to another.
He DIED there?
That’s IT?
What did he DO there?