To: DaveMSmith; boatbums; XeniaSt; RnMomof7; metmom; Alex Murphy; roamer_1; daniel1212; Natural Law; ...
DaveMSmith :
Well, we do have the Word now, thanks to the Reformation and do have the spiritual freedom to read it and understand it with sound DoctrineYes, that's why folks like you would reject the Trinity and as you said have come to the conclusion that Swedenborg was the Paraclete
Lots of new interpretations each day
49 posted on
12/18/2012 6:38:04 AM PST by
Cronos
(**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
To: Cronos
I said some have come to that conclusion. Some find it no more than a Bible Study aid and most are in between I suppose.
By your response and your ping list, it would seem you long for the days of the infallible pope dictating the meaning of Scripture and issuing papal bulls that are held up higher than the Word itself. God didn't buy that.
52 posted on
12/18/2012 6:52:48 AM PST by
DaveMSmith
(Evil Comes from Falsity, So Share the Truth)
To: Cronos
And, for the record, I do not reject the Trinity. I reject the trinity of personS - which you cannot even provide a sound definition of. Personas. I reject your definition.
Actor or mask is accurate - it's as phony as a 3 dollar bill.
53 posted on
12/18/2012 7:00:13 AM PST by
DaveMSmith
(Evil Comes from Falsity, So Share the Truth)
To: Cronos
Lots of new interpretations each day A said and shown, some of the most perverse interpretations occur under sola ecclesia, that itself being one itself, that a person or office is supreme and possesses assured infallibility (perpetual or not), and thus the borg is more akin to the LDS and Rome.
66 posted on
12/18/2012 9:08:50 AM PST by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson