[MDspinboyredux]

Any of the above could have beaten Obama with a unified and energized party behind them. What a stupid a$$ed comment. ANY of our candidates, even Romney, would have won with a unified and energized party. But since your candidate, a one-term Senator who LOST his re-election bid, didn't win you picked up your ball and went home. Rather than being unified behind a set of values, we have become factionalized supporting individuals instead of ideas. Please reflect on your priorities this January 21st.

[Antoninus]

ANY of our candidates, even Romney, would have won with a unified and energized party. But since your candidate, a one-term Senator who LOST his re-election bid, didn't win you picked up your ball and went home.

No, I have said since 2007 that I would not support Romney under any circumstances as he is no better than a democrat and would accelerate the liberalization of the GOP. Many other conservatives said likewise. But you morons, in your smarter-than-thou wisdom, decided to nominate him anyway and, as this article indicates, the bum got the smallest evangelical turn-out since 1996.

Enjoy four more years of Obama. And in 2016, if you decide to nominate another moderate loser, you can count on repeated doses of the same medicine.

If you want our support, nominate a conservative.

[dfwgator]

ALL of the Republican candidates sucked, every single one of them.